Emoticon Suggestions, Thoughts, and Feedback

[Balt 108]

Kangaroo Twilight? is cute

 

Edited August 8, 2022 by Balt

[Starset Twinkle 455]

1 hour ago, Sparklefan1234 said:

It's at the top of the reply box next to the eye icon. 

Okay, thanks a lot! 

[PerlsteinProps 26,491]

I would hope that some new emoticons are made, it's been a while since the forums had any meaningful updates. 

[Megas 27,323]

Still waiting on this one

[outlaw_f0x 149]

would love some halloween-y emoticons! like flutterbat or twilight in her star swirl the bearded costume!

[Splashee 28,547]

Who decided that every emoji need to be bold?

So many suggestions here require so much more to "work".

 

Also, G5 ponies bold just don't work at all.

[Jeric 46,838]

On 2022-10-08 at 2:42 PM, Splashee said:

Who decided that every emoji need to be bold?

I’m not sure what you mean by ‘bold’. Can you clarify that for me? 

[Splashee 28,547]

2 minutes ago, Jeric said:

I’m not sure what you mean by ‘bold’. Can you clarify that for me? 

<- They don't have any hair

[Jeric 46,838]

2 minutes ago, Splashee said:

<- They don't have any hair

Oh bald! 
 

It was a decision made when the forum started over 11 years ago using the stock emoji as a template, and it’s one that was kept over the years to preserve a cohesive look across the design. I use the reactions to show a more complete image. I’ll be constantly rotating reactions from here on themed for events. 

I’m not going to change emoji already in place because that opens up a change for emoji breaking, and some staff in the past did that which is why you occasionally see

:emoji: 

More importantly to me is that many of the past emoji have an emotional connection to them from users who had ‘won’ them, or had a staff member create them for a user as a surprise. 
 

[PerlsteinProps 26,491]

@Jeric

I am glad that the "laugh" reaction was removed due to it's misusage in the debate pit. 

[Rikifive 23,561]

4 hours ago, Props ValRoa said:

@Jeric

I am glad that the "laugh" reaction was removed due to it's misusage in the debate pit. 

But now posting memes is sad.  

4 hours ago, Splashee said:

<- They don't have any hair

Oooh I've been also wondering what bold meant.  

Well, to add to what Jeric said, in my opinion, design-wise, these bald emojis are more expressive in such small dimensions. A perfect example are reactions, that often confuse members, because it's sometimes hard to "see" what they actually mean.

For example, take this Starlight emoji with mane:

 

In 32x32 pixels it's kinda... 

By editing out the mane and focusing on the face itself, the emojis are much clearer.

 

Or another scenario, seeing emojis like this:

It's not bad per se, but the square-y look feels a little bit... cheap perhaps? And different emojis can have such sharp edges on different sides making a set of these look a bit random and messy.

 

All emojis being bald and formatted equally create a unique, very characteristic set of emojis, that nicely work with each other. And since there are so many emojis in that particular style already in place, adding some "different" ones would ruin the effect and the very first impression would be that these are out of place, so to speak.

If you'd see these round emojis somewhere, you'd probably instantly think about MLP Forums, because that's how unique and characteristic these emojis are, and that's the nice thing worth keeping. 

[Splashee 28,547]

We are currently really missing a hug reaction.

[flutterJackdash 218]

Or any of the actual practical reactions that sound like actual reactions. I can't figure a use for any of these new ones.

[North Star 4,552]

 

On 2022-10-18 at 5:32 PM, Splashee said:

We are currently really missing a hug reaction.

 "I have found a flaw in the model that I perceive is the critical functioning structure of the forum that defines how the world works.... so to speak." ~ Alan Greenspan

 

 

[Jeric 46,838]

On 2023-01-26 at 2:53 AM, abrony-mouse said:

 

 "I have found a flaw in the model that I perceive is the critical functioning structure of the forum that defines how the world works.... so to speak." ~ Alan Greenspan

 

 

Nah. It’s working.

 

We don’t have a hug emoji. Emojis are usually emotions expressed on face. Reactions are their own system. 

@Rikifive has an appropriate image for Twilight’s face hugging itself. 
 

 

[Splashee 28,547]

On 2023-01-26 at 8:53 AM, abrony-mouse said:

 

 

I have been looking all over the place for those hug reaction images. You see, when they aren't in the reaction list, you can still use the images if you remember the URL for them. And hugging is often needed. I'm going to go and hug @Tropical Melody right now , though he often need the pondering reaction (which I didn't save the URL for ).

[ZiggWheelsManning 8,204]

Splashee, we need sad Scootaloo emoji.  

The crying one from "Flight to the Finish".  

[North Star 4,552]

one seasonal reaction emoticon.

these leaves should become a snowball in winter :3

then a spring flower

then a blazing sun

then back to leaves

ponies for pony purposes only (emoticons do not need to be ponies)

[Octavia Heartstrings 28,587]

I feel like Octavia really deserves an emoji. Either one of these would be lovely!