Jump to content
Banner by ~ Kyoshi Frost Wolf

Which came first? The chicken or the egg?


Rift enchanted

  

70 users have voted

  1. 1. Which came first the chicken or the egg?

    • Chicken
      28
    • Egg
      42


Recommended Posts

Just as the title implies. Which came first? I'm not just looking for the answer, I wanna see some explanation behind your theory. I also have a challenge. Don't use google.


You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it save equistria with its five candy coloured friends and shoot rainbows at bad guys using their necklaces and tiara unless you're celestia
Also if your not familiar with the count to one million post then check out our welcoming cheer!
http://mlpforums.com/topic/69955-count-to-one-million/page-1188
Just scroll to the bottom and it'll be there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well our waitress brought out my chicken sandwich and my mom's scrambled eggs at the same time so they both came concurrently. It was a decent lunch.

  • Brohoof 13

ICeIx2X.jpg
MLP Forums' resident timelord, sports dilettante, and purveyor of wit and humor
~*Traveling Timelord Nonpareil*~
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well in a way I do have to agree with the egg because you have eggs for breakfast, then chicken for lunch or supper.

  • Brohoof 3

You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it save equistria with its five candy coloured friends and shoot rainbows at bad guys using their necklaces and tiara unless you're celestia
Also if your not familiar with the count to one million post then check out our welcoming cheer!
http://mlpforums.com/topic/69955-count-to-one-million/page-1188
Just scroll to the bottom and it'll be there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Neither. It was the proto-chicken. An ancestor to the chicken.

There.

  • Brohoof 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The egg came first. Eggs were being laid long before any bird had started to evolve.

 

Even if you specify a chicken egg, the first chicken egg was laid by a bird that was not quite a chicken, tricky as it is to pinpoint when that was.

  • Brohoof 1

 

On 4/22/2016 at 6:16 PM, The Nightly Spectre said:

One does not ask why The Questioner is awesome. One should instead ask their gods if they ever compare to the awesomeness of the one and only Questioner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Neither really, based on evolution by natural selection one species didn't magically hatch into a chicken after one generation. What actually happened was a very very long time ago one species hatched with one little trait that allowed it to be more reproductively fit and this happened over and over again so that the combination of traits acquired over millions of years gave us what we call a chicken today. This means that this question kind of implies chicken or egg from beginning, when in reality it was I guess an egg that hatched into a chicken after millions of years of evolution.

  • Brohoof 6

9DbY353.png

Sig by The Frozen Pegasus

Avatar by Royal Samurott

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I do believe eggs came about long before humans evolved and were able to create structures like the Chichen Itza, so... the egg, of course.

 

(Sorry, couldn't resist).

Edited by Envy
  • Brohoof 1

mlpwoodwinds.jpg
Everything needs more woodwind!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think I will answer this to be honest...it's a trick question. >_<
Let me explain...this thread has something to do with the theory of evolution, right? Well think about it...in order for the egg the exist, the chicken must come first, BUT in order for the chicken to exist the egg must come first. To say that the chicken came first does not mean the egg never existed, and to say the egg came first does not mean the chicken never existed. Theoretically, if you compare this to the never ending argument that Adam and Eve were the first humans created by, not apes, doesn't mean that evolution ceased to exist...to say that we originated from apes and not from a deity does not mean that there weren't any humans in the first place before hand. 

Forgive me if I went a little off topic. ^ ^'
Feel free to contradict me, but it's just how I think of it...

 

Edited by Retro Bunny
  • Brohoof 1

      ℓ٥ﻻ  ﻉ√٥υ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Theoretically, if you compare this to the never ending argument that Adam and Eve were the first humans created by, not apes, doesn't mean that evolution ceased to exist

 

Actually, that's sort of incorrect! O: The Bible states that God created every creature, specifically human was created in his perfect image

 

"Then the Lord God formed the man of dust from the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living creature." [Genesis]

 

“Worthy are you, our Lord and God, to receive glory and honor and power, for you created all things, and by your will they existed and were created.” [Revelation, I think]

 

With these two quotes, we can discern a couple of things:

  1. That, just as humans, all other creatures were created from a recipe of Earth and God breath :P
  2. That everything we know to exist was created once and only once

The Bible doesn't have anything about evolution in it, only the sudden creation by God.

 

"For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse." [Romans]

 

Implies, mostly, that everything was created by Him in the way He wanted them to be from the start. He used his invisible attributes (his power and divinity), then probably said something like, "I'm going to make a chicken" and hence, he made a chicken.

 

So, in conclusion:

 

Creationism: Chicken came first

  • Brohoof 2

...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say the egg since somehow the Earth had possibly formed the egg and had been warmed within the ground till the hatching and so on the chicken lived 

 

 

 

(i have more info on that but i'm half asleep so i can't think so much about it)


The deepest of the Everfree!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since the result of any mutation will only show up in the offspring..

Egg, of course.  

  • Brohoof 1

              ,#   <- click the tip of the banana to add me on steam!
               \ `-._____,-'=/
            ____`._ ----- _,'_____ My sig seem to be too good for Poniverse, so here's a banana
                   `-----'
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, that's sort of incorrect! O: The Bible states that God created every creature, specifically human was created in his perfect image

 

"Then the Lord God formed the man of dust from the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living creature." [Genesis]

 

“Worthy are you, our Lord and God, to receive glory and honor and power, for you created all things, and by your will they existed and were created.” [Revelation, I think]

 

With these two quotes, we can discern a couple of things:

  1. That, just as humans, all other creatures were created from a recipe of Earth and God breath :P
  2. That everything we know to exist was created once and only once

The Bible doesn't have anything about evolution in it, only the sudden creation by God.

 

"For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse." [Romans]

 

Implies, mostly, that everything was created by Him in the way He wanted them to be from the start. He used his invisible attributes (his power and divinity), then probably said something like, "I'm going to make a chicken" and hence, he made a chicken.

 

So, in conclusion:

 

Creationism: Chicken came first

Ooooh I see!

Nice evidence you pulled up there. =w=

Edited by Retro Bunny
  • Brohoof 2

      ℓ٥ﻻ  ﻉ√٥υ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ooooh I see!

Nice evidence you pulled up there. =w=

 

It gets really tricky with the Bible XD Because nothing is said about Evolution, there is still room for interpretation if you're extremely keen on re-wording :P All in all, the Bible is mostly about interpretation, which is bad :/ leaves a lot of room for jerks to use it for their own gain.

 

And thanks XD;;; I did a lot of religious studies on my own when I went through a period of spiritual confusion. The Hebrews also had a lot to say about the creation of Earth and stuff CX

  • Brohoof 2

...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Join the herd!

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...