I understand that the clone in this scenario would have the memories and I assumed that it would also be grown at an accelerated rate from a tube or whatever place would suffice.
This isn't Star Trek. We don't have such technological capabilities, if they are even feasible to begin with. You've introduced a new element to the discussion that wasn't part of the original premise. That's fine, but it changes the nature of the debate to something that I and others here weren't basing our points on. I was arguing from the position relating to technologies the present or the foreseeable future, since cloning is possible albeit imperfect, not those from a science fiction series set in the 23rd century.
Uh, yeah... I would care. If I had decided to clone myself, or found out I was a clone, that would be pretty important in my view. And no, it isn't me. Not from my perspective. Once my physical matter is disintegrated I'm killed instantly, even if it is reassembled my consciousness is gone. Living matter is a bit different from inanimate objects.
Well that's the only way we've got at the moment. Actually, the super aging process probably isn't even practicable at this point which means in order to have a true clone ready at a moments notice, you'd have to grow it from the moment of the original's conception and keep it in stasis(so as to not form it's own conflicting memories), pumped with transferred memories until it's ready for use. In other words, a slave. Actually less than that, a product.
Very ethical proposition you've got there.