Unikitty

You misunderstand. The movie is going to be done in the same style as the TV show. It'll look the same, visually. It has Meghan McCarthy doing the screenplay, so it will have the same writing style. It will look and feel and sound like MLPFiM. The only difference is that it will be feature length. You are not going to see themes that you would consider out of place for MLPFiM. It is theMLP movie. It's basically exactly the same as the Pokemon movie franchise. Plotwise, they're not connected to the anime directly. But thematically, they appear in all ways to be a part of the Pokemon series franchise. This is what I mean by 'thematically'.

Thematically. It's still MLPFiM in design, and thus would adhere to that style. It's not a retelling of the franchise, like the Transformers movies are. So it is an extension of the series in this regard.

Gee, it's almost as if they're best friends or something.

Does the show NEED a gay pairing? No. Do I care whether or not it gets one(or several)? Nope. But IF they were ever to have one, it would need to be it's own arc. Diversity for the sake of diversity is just as problematic and ignorant as outright exclusion. It becomes false awareness and these bandwagons can seriously hurt the cause. Ideally, you'd want focus on the relationship, and explanation as to why it's there. Same-sex relationships are still very much a controversial topic, and just throwing in a gay couple and saying "Hey have some gays, they exist so put up with it!" isn't actually helping explain the importance of the cause. That in lies your catch 22, due to this show being what it is. Such a topic is too controversial at this time, and doesn't appeal to the target demographic enough. The problems caused won't be able to outweigh the potential benefits. Shoehorning it in will just damage the franchise as a whole.

All this reaching. No, there won't be any sort of saucy business in the movie. The movie is an extension of the show. Wouldn't want it anyway. Sauciness doesn't fit into the shows theme, and inserting it would just be off-putting. All these horny kids wanting adult themes in a children's cartoon are why the fandom get such a bad rap.

If it were ever defined further, I'd like it to take much inspiration from the Tartarus spoken in human legends. A pleace that's existed for longer than any alicorn. A place of great unweildy magic that seems to exist solely for the most evil of beings, and yet with origins lost to time.

Creation. An artist by trade, a creator by ambition. If I want to make it, I'll figure a way to do so. Doesn't matter what, creation is just what courses through my veins.

It wouldn't work, and if it did it'd be no different to any other country in the world with its own set of culture. You could just rename any existing country in the world and it'd be about the same.

This thread has shown virtually no love for best horse, the pink one. Warning: Booty Shake

I don't really believe that the natural magical aura gives off light. I can't recall specific scenes, but I feel like there have been times when magic such as telekinesis was used but wasn't attributed to a character by other characters. Don't forget that unicorns can do a variety of spells. In situations such as lighting a dark area(as shown in an image by a prior user) it's pretty clear that the light emitted is that of an active spell and not that of passive magical aura as seen when using other spells. In some cases, it could be speculated that raw magic aura could be seen - such as high powered spells being cast(Twilight moving the Ursa Minor). However I wouldn't so much consider this as part of their casual passive aura, but rather the fallout of intense and unstable magic use.