Sir Wulfington

The difference with children is that they may be okay with it at the time, but later on, when they grow older and learn what exactly it was that they did back then, it will seriously fuck them up, because they will have realized that they did something perverted with someone they wouldn't have had they known what it was they were doing. Animals, however, never have this problem.

The law doesn't dictate what's right, tho. They do understand what's going on, they just can't understand the consequences, if any. Like a guy with an std could fuck a horse and infect it, and even tho the horse consented by allowing the sex to happen, it was not aware that jt could be diseased as a result. But nobody should be doing anything that could pass around their illnesses period. And yes, some animals are not physically compatible enough with humans, that's why I said it would have to be safe for both parties, Like nobdy should be trying to screw a house cat or chicken, that would be rape by default because there's no way they'd be okay with that since it would physically hurt them.

Not true at all, if they don't want it, they'll make it very clear through body language, which can involve you're death. Sex with animals is perfectly fine assuming it's physically safe and they don't show any indication they have a problem with it. You may as well say we can't ride horses if they don't verbally say we can, if to you someone or something can only consent if they say they want it. Body language can tell you everything you need to know.

Something about style you need to understand, there's a difference between that and simply bad proportioning. Whether you're exaggerating eyes or the length of certain limbs, the character needs to look like it could actually physically function. It needs to be symmetrical. I also don't see anything....styled about it. You drew in a manga style and put glitter on it, that's not a style. The problems with this are the lack of depth (no shading to give shape to the subject) and poor proportioning. I could go into further detail, but all you need to do is google up an image of a human being and you can see what exactly is wrong with your picture. Honestly, it seems to be like you're doing something I used to do, you're forcing a style. A style is something that comes naturally to you, a way of drawing people or animals that you like, and as I said you need to make sure things are still anatomically correct. It has to look like the character could exist as a real living being unless the point is that it's supposed to look illogical, which I can tell is not what you intended. When drawing realistically or cartoony, you need to use real life references to make sure you're doing it right, and to understand how the lighting and shading work. And don't listen to the "artists" who claim that using references are bad, only a fool or a egotist who wants to feel superior to other artists avoids using references. Any good artist will use references to make sure they're work is right. Of course, you can memorize certain things, but it's always best to be absolutely certain. But don't even worry about style, you don't need a unique style. You can never know for certain if you're style is unique anyway (and I guarantee, yours isn't). You want your art to look aesthetically pleasing to you, that's all that ultimately matters unless you're doing it for other people. And there are all kinds of free guides for lighting/shading, anatomy, etc. online, you won't need art school. This is all assuming you want help, though. But the first step to improvement is admitting that you're not doing it right to begin with, if you won't accept that, than there's nothing that can be done. I hope you'll make the right decision.