Personality Types

[Wolveon 56]

Introvert(67%)  Sensing(50%)  Thinking(1%)  Perceiving(11)%

I'm okay with this.

For the My Little Pony chart I scored as Spike, which again I am okay with. X3

[DR Leper Lupinstein 410]

Extravert(44%) iNtuitive(62%) Feeling(38%) Judging(33%)

You have moderate preference of Extraversion over Introversion (44%)
You have distinctive preference of Intuition over Sensing (62%)
You have moderate preference of Feeling over Thinking (38%)
You have moderate preference of Judging over Perceiving (33%)

 

hmm... moderate preference of judging over perceiving??? i don't see myself as being judgmental. I usually get to know others before i draw conclusions of others.

 

[Magpie 623]

Introvert(44%)  iNtuitive(88%)  Feeling(12%)  Judging(22%)

• You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (44%)
• You have strong preference of Intuition over Sensing (88%)
• You have slight preference of Feeling over Thinking (12%)
• You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)

Already knew I was introverted. I don't ever really have to recharge from social situations or anything like that though, I just generally dislike being around people.

 

I am Zecora, which I can see. (I'm not going to start ryhming though.)

Edited April 27, 2013 by Brosparkles

[Steel Accord 6,660]

I've taken one of these tests before. INFP "The Idealist" according to Myers-Briggs. I like it.  The test result has actually become a factor in helping me improve myself. I feel like doing things in line with what it describe feel "right." Not universally, but often enough to be reliable. That said I've never seen one when compared to a pony character chart. I wonder who I am like? . . .

 

 

 

HELL YEAH!!!   

Edited April 27, 2013 by Steel Accord

[Scootalove 10,689]

Well, I took the test and so far from my results I think I am more of the lines of the pony right here, just look down and you will see which pony's personality that I am more like.

 

[Dark Moon 965]

INTJ

Introvert(67%)  iNtuitive(25%)  Thinking(25%)  Judging(33%)

• You have distinctive preference of Introversion over Extraversion (67%)
• You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing (25%)
• You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (25%)
• You have moderate preference of Judging over Perceiving (33%)

Not surprising at all to me

[Hypn0ticD 1,213]

After taking the test, I recieved the following scores:

 

Introvert(89%)  Sensing(100%)  Thinking(1%)  Perceiving(56)%

• You have strong preference of Introversion over Extraversion (89%) - I thought I'd be more of an introvert than this!
• You have strong preference of Sensing over Intuition (100%) - ...Yeah, that's me to a T!
• You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling (1%) - ... Translation: I haz no feelz!
• You have moderate preference of Perceiving over Judging (56%) - Not too sure if this is good or bad, to be honest!

[Night Shine 770]

I took an online test as part of the Brony Herd Census thingy, and here's what it told me:

 

 

So, I'm an INFJ. That's pretty awesome, I think. x3

Apparently I'm a lot like Zecora--which doesn't make much sense to me--but I'm a percentage point away from Woona, mah favorite poni, so I am okay with this :3

Edited April 27, 2013 by Night Shine

[Unpredictable Ranger 696]

My personality when perceived with the personality diagram that Swoop posted would make me Princess Luna still has been the same me: INFP.

  On 2011-12-10 at 9:57 AM, Swoop said:

I believe we may have had this before, but I can't seem to remember my result, so I suppose I'll take the test again!

And if anyone's interested, somepony has gone and created a corresponding pony MBTI chart, so you can see which character resembles your personality the most.

[Mightymags 1,053]

I got INTJ which puts me as princess Celestia. This is actually a pretty big shock to me, I always though I would be ISFP but I got opposite on almost everything. I think I spent more time actually considering these questions though than the last time I took it. 

[XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 777]

I've taken this test several times throughout my time on the net and it's always shifted. I've been a ISTJ, ISFP, ISTP, INFJ and ISFJ. The only one that I've scored multiple times is ISFJ, which is coincidentally the personality I received once more on this test. Here's the numbers 'cause why not right?

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

ISFJ

Introvert(33%)  Sensing(12%)  Feeling(25%)  Judging(11%)

 

• You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (33%)
• You have slight preference of Sensing over Intuition (12%)
• You have moderate preference of Feeling over Thinking (25%)
• You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (11%)

 

 

[aoEAF2FBvC0MIo2Q 3,673]

Introvert (56%)

Sensing (12%)

Thinking (38%)

Perceiving (56%)

 

This was, Spike, right? Hm, seems pretty consistent now. At one time I used to go back and forth between ISTP and INTP.

Lately however in my experiment with vulnerability, I've been allowing myself to feel more... that and I've become more conscious about my own emotional frailties lately as I've been digging in the human condition on topics such as addiction, brain development and attachment (which are all linked together may I add).

Edited May 25, 2013 by SunBurn

[~Luminiferous Ether~ 107]

INFP

Introvert(33%)  iNtuitive(38%)  Feeling(50%)  Perceiving(33)%

• You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (33%)
• You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing (38%)
• You have moderate preference of Feeling over Thinking (50%)
• You have moderate preference of Perceiving over Judging (33%)

I'm a Luna but I'm more a Fluttershy, what.

[Commander Urdnot 2,680]

:0 Sweet! A Myers Briggs thread.

 

I love psychology, especially when it involves personality, so I've spent countless hours studying Myers Briggs, Enneagram of Personality, Socionics, and the like. I think personality is fascinating, and consequently, I find the great many theories out there surrounding personality to be fascinating as well.

 

However I must express just how much I detest these personality tests, and personality descriptions that were written by Frosty the Snowman and his army of unpaid interns that have never once come into contact with human beings. Or evidently, any information that truly goes in-depth about Myers Briggs. As anyone who has a basic understanding of Myers Briggs would know that this test, and the descriptions of the personality types you find online are usually superficial, and don't so in-depth at all. Showing how little they actually know about Myers Briggs, the cognitive functions, the personality type they are trying to describe. It's like watching Miss South Carolina try to talk about politics. It's laughable.

 

I'm sure most people are aware that the tests and descriptions are crap, and are just doing this for fun, but it frustrates me because I often do see people struggle with themselves because of these stupid tests. Especially introverted sensors and introverted feelers.

 

I don't like this test in particular because the questions aren't really that good. It often repeats them, I usually end up wishing there a 3rd option that said "Depends," instead of the black-and-white A or B answers that you are provided. The questions themselves aren't even that relevant to the type. Not only that, but the test is too short, and it's very popular, so a lot of people are subjected to it.

 

 

Anyways, here's what the test thinks I am:

INTP

Introvert(22%)  iNtuitive(75%)  Thinking(1%)  Perceiving(67)%

• You have slight preference of Introversion over Extraversion (22%)
• You have distinctive preference of Intuition over Sensing (75%)
• You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling (1%)
• You have distinctive preference of Perceiving over Judging (67%)

 

I agree with some portions of my result, and I also disagree with about as much. I'm definitely not an INTP, I'm an ENTP. While I'm not the most sociable person in the world, I am upbeat, loud, and outspoken, and I am also stimulated by things and events that are in the outside world. Introverts are stimulated by what's in their head, Extroverts are stimulated by things in the outside world. It's about events and activity, not necessarily about people and socializing, that's people often have problems understanding introversion/extroversion. The test failed to take that into account, because it has a poor understanding of how Myers Briggs actually works, that's why it labeled me as introverted. (Also, extroverts can be overwhelmed by events and activity in the outside world. Just because you're stimulated by something doesn't mean you can't be overwhelmed by it.)

 

I agree when it says that I'm 75% iNtuitive. I've always been a bigger-picture kind of guy who cares more about the general idea rather than all of those pointless, meaningless details. This is why I hate school so much, I have that iNtuition pounding in my head asking, "What's the freaken point of all this?" It also explains why I like learning with pictures and charts more than I do with auditory, and hands-on learning. I also tend to be pretty darn abstract. Even I lose myself at times. I detest routine, feel disconnected from the outside world, favor innovation, and always ask "Why?" All very iNtuitive things to do. Plus 75% is a nice looking number too.

 

As for the thinking/feeling, I actually agree with it. Because feelers aren't always nice, and thinkers aren't always blunt. Feeling is more about values, individuality, and empathy than it is about being nice to people. You can be a feeling type, and be a total ass, and you can be a thinking type and be the nicest person on the planet. The key difference here is perspective. A feeler is nice because they are very empathetic. They use their feeling to feel how the other person would feel, and they make their decisions based off of that. A healthy, developed feeling personality-type wouldn't cheat on their significant other, because that would go against their internal values, and they would use their empathy skills to put themselves in the other person's shoes. A healthy, developed thinking personality-type relies on logic. They wouldn't cheat because they would look at it logically, it's be much easier to just talk to their significant other about it, and try to fix the problem, or they could just end the relationship they're in now, and go peruse this other person. If they get caught it just makes things harder for everyone, so logically, they wouldn't do it. I agree with this result because I both use values and empathy and logic when making decisions.

 

Lastly, we have perceiving. While I am a perceiving-personality type, I'm surprised I only got a 67%. I'm extremely groundless, open-minded, lazy, and laid-back. I thought for sure I'd have an 80%+ or a 75% at the very least.

 

Oh, and Apple Bloom is not an ENTP; Discord is an ENTP. I don't know what Apple Bloom is. but she's not ENTP.

 

Shoot me a PM if you're interested in your type, and about this stuff, I love talking to people about it. :w

Edited May 25, 2013 by Commander Urdnot

[Eureka 1,119]

ESFJ

 

1% Extrovert, 25% Sensing, 50% Feeling, 22% Judging.

 

Interesting,

 

Apparently I match Cheerilee's personality. I guess I could see that.

[Unpredictable Ranger 696]

What is the difference between Myers Briggs and Jungian personality assessments? When I first gone through the a personality test that has this ENFP - ISTJ - ISTP - ENFJ whatevers was an Jungian personality one.... can someone explain these to me?

[Inactive01 5,299]

Your Type

ISFJ

Introvert(44%)  Sensing(1%)  Feeling(12%)  Judging(56%)

• You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (44%)
• You have marginal or no preference of Sensing over Intuition (1%)
• You have slight preference of Feeling over Thinking (12%)
• You have moderate preference of Judging over Perceiving (56%)

 

I've taken this test a few times and I get the same result all the time.

Detailed information about ISFJs

[Sapphire Quill 1,186]

I got

 

INFP

Introvert(78%)  iNtuitive(12%)  Feeling(38%)  Perceiving(11)%

You have strong preference of Introversion over Extraversion (78%)

You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)

You have moderate preference of Feeling over Thinking (38%)

You have slight preference of Perceiving over Judging (11%)

 

Which is Slightly Weird in my mind, I would think I would of gotten Feeling as the strongest of them all, but I'm happy with my result.

I took this a couple of times, Different Results None the Less, Yet this is what I got most of the time

~Sapphire

[Unpredictable Ranger 696]

It seems that time has changed me so much. I was INFP before I joined MLPforums. I'm surprised, tbh.

 

So I decided to take the test moments ago and it turned out that I am actually...

 

ESTP

Extravert(11%)  Sensing(1%)  Thinking(1%)  Perceiving(33)%

• You have slight preference of Extraversion over Introversion (11%)
• You have marginal or no preference of Sensing over Intuition (1%)
• You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling (1%)
• You have moderate preference of Perceiving over Judging (33%)

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

http://typelogic.com/estp.html

 

 

Extraverted Sensing Thinking Perceiving by Joe Butt

Profile: ESTP
Revision: 3.0
Date of Revision: 23 Feb 2005

ESTPs are spontaneous, active folks. Like the other SPs, ESTPs get great satisfaction from acting on their impulses. Activities involving great power, speed, thrill and risk are attractive to the ESTP. Chronic stifling of these impulses makes the ESTP feel "dead inside."

Gamesmanship is the calling card of the ESTP. Persons of this type have a natural drive to best the competition. Some of the most successful salespersons are ESTPs. P.T. Barnum ("Never give a sucker an even break") illustrates the unscrupulous contingent of this type.

Almost unconsciously the ESTP looks for nonverbal, nearly subliminal cues as to what makes her quarry "tick." Once she knows, she waits for just the right time to trump the unsuspecting victim's ace and glory in her conquest. Oddly enough, the ESTP seems to admire and respect anyone who can beat her at her own game.

"If I was any better, I couldn't stand it!" To an ESTP, admission of weakness feels like failure. He admires strength in himself and in others.

"Shock effect" is a favored technique of this type to get the attention of his audience. ESTPs love to be at center stage, demonstrating feats of wonder and daring.

Functional Analysis:

Extraverted Sensing

These are the ultimate realists. Extraverted Sensors are at one with objects and experiencesnow, in the only living, pulsing moment that ever really exists. The Sensor is compelled to see, touch, taste, smell and feel all that moves, wafts, tingles, tinkles, scintillates, vibrates or resonates. Some ESTPs are keenly discriminating; only those elements of singular quality and experience will suffice. Others revel in earthiness. If baseness can elicit shock from more squeamish observers, so much the better.

Introverted Thinking

Even a consummate Sensor needs to decide which hand to grasp the gusto with; Introverted Thinking is her preferred yardstick. Introverted, and auxiliary to Sensing, the T function maintains a low profile, keeps its opinions mainly to itself, and readily yields to allow Sensing to savor a special moment. The ESTP preference for mental, physical and emotional toughness surely can be traced to this detached, rational function.

Extraverted Feeling

Though only a minor character, Feeling plays an important role in a favorite pastime of ESTPs. This is not to say that ESTPs don't care deeply for others, yet Feeling is such a ready hand-puppet, expedient in disarming the "victim" and exposing the jugular. Sincere Feeling is tertiary and thus relatively simplistic in this type. As such, it can be the undoing of ESTPs at the hands of those they (perhaps unconsciously) come to trust.

Introverted iNtuition

In the inferior (fourth) position, intuition may be virtually absent much of the time. Haziness of inner, symbolic vision is the psychic price of the clarity of sensory awareness. As do other SPs, ESTPs reserve a certain "gut" sense of timing and luck. When repression and stress empower the Shadow, it likely finds expression through intuition in stereotypic perceptions of groups and individuals whom it perceives and hostile or hurtful.

Famous ESTPs:

Jacob (Esau's brother)

U.S. Presidents: James Buchanan

Mae West
Ernest Hemingway
Lucille Ball
Roy Rogers
Doris Day
Chuck Yeager
"Babe" Didrikson Zaharias, female athlete and multiple U.S. Olympic Gold Medalist
Jack Nicholson
Eddie Murphy
Jimmy Conners
Madonna
Cybil Shepherd
Bruce Willis
Natalie Cole
Michael J. Fox
Joan Cusack

Fictional:

Heathcliffe
Louie DaPalma (Taxi)
Catherine Earnshaw (Wuthering Heights)

Copyright © 2012 Joe Butt

Chat with fellow ESTPs at the ESTP forum by PersonalityCafe. 
Career Development for ESTPs 
Jung Typology for the Workplace (Pre-employment testing and team building resources for your organization)

Type Relationships for ESTPs:

Identity
Pal
Complement
Contrast

Supplement
Anima
Suitemate
Cohort

Companion
Tribesman
Advisor
Pedagogue

Enigma
Novelty
Neighbor
Counterpart

 

More information about Type Relationships

 

 

 

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

http://www.humanmetrics.com/hr/you/careerchoices.aspx?EI=11&SN=1&TF=1&JP=-33

 

ESTPs often find themselves in occupations that require prompt and active response. ESTPs succeed as salespeople, crime and fraud investigators, sailors, racing drivers, athletes, actors, entrepreneurs, rescue operation staff, and sometimes politicians and special combat forces. Many ESTPs are found among implementation and maintenance specialists.

 

Jung Career Indicator™ determines occupations and areas in which ESTPs find themselves most fulfilled and content, are most successful, and therefore are most represented in. Based on your personality type, the following is a list of the most suitable areas of occupations along with some examples of educational institutions, where you can receive a relevant degree or training. Please click occupation names and institution logos for more information. The most preferred areas appear first.

This material and the test are provided to you free of charge. If you find it useful, please like it on Facebook, Google or share it on Twitter - use the social share buttons on the left.

 

<removed table and images> -- because the table has so many off-site images, so just refer to the URL at the beginning of this spoiler tag

Famous Personalities Sharing Your Type

• Donald Trump, an American real-estate mogul
• Steven Seagal, an actor
• Jack Nicholson, an actor
• Cybil Shepherd, an American actress and singer

Of Interest

• Check the Huffington Post’s list of the fiction book characters associated with each personality type

 

 

 

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

http://www.humanmetrics.com/hr/business/preemploymenttesting.aspx

 

Understanding the personality types and natural behavioural preferences of job candidates can both substantially enhance your candidate selection and pre-employment screening process, and be an invaluable instrument for the smooth integration and successful start of a new high-ranking manager or a team member.

When interviewing a job candidate, you as a hiring manager or human resources professional (or your company’s hiring and human resources managers) face the challenge of knowing nothing about the personality of the candidate you are about to meet. What questions should you ask during an interview to reveal the candidate’s strengths, and to probe at any weak areas? Will he or she get along with your team members? Will he or she get along with you? What about with your boss? Will the candidate bring personality strengths to the table that the current team might be lacking? How will you ensure the successful integration of a new team member or ensure a promoted employee succeeds in a new role? This is where assessing the personality of your candidates with the Jung Typology Profiler for Workplace comes in handy.

 

What is the Jung Typology Profiler for Workplace™ (JTPW)?

The Jung Typology Profiler for Workplace™ is the professional version of the Jung Typology Test you just took. It is specifically created to address the needs of the workplace and is aimed at organizations and businesses. More info on JTPW...

Personality Assessment of Job Candidates

Assessments with JTPW are commonly used by organizations for the comprehensive assessment of job candidates (both prospective employees and internal candidates up for promotion), as a part of the pre-employment screening or succession planning process. It comes in handy when:

• a candidate’s propensity toward certain behaviours and soft skills is critical for the job, and/or
• the smooth and effective integration of the candidate into the existing team and organization’s culture is important

With JTPW, you will obtain:

• Workplace-oriented behavioural scores and comprehensive multi-page personality profiles of your candidates
• Personality compatibility guidelines and a candidate’s compatibility scores for specific occupations
• The convenience of side-by-side comparison of the results of multiple candidates
• Behavioural interview guidelines, including sample questions relevant to a candidate’s personality type
• And more

Personality profiles generated by JTPW include scores of workplace-oriented behavioural indices, interpretative textual and visual materials, and are dynamically generated by the built-in expert system. The behavioural scores cover such areas as: leadership, communication and interpersonal skills, empathy, diligence, rationality and analyticity, and are presented in the Personality Radar graph:

The profiles provide a personalized description of a candidate, covering such insights into a candidate’s personality as: their most likely strengths and weaknesses in the workplace, the strengths of their behavioural preferences, their motivational factors, conflict resolution style, problem-solving and decision making style, communication style and more.

The Job Compatibility Guidelines and Scoring module (JCG) uses a built-in algorithm to score a candidate’s personality compatibility for job titles of your interest on the scale of 0-100%. The out-of-the-box list of job titles available for compatibility scoring includes many common occupations, including various sales positions, mid- and high-ranking management and more.

In addition to the compatibility score, you get job compatibility guidelines for each such job title. The job compatibility guidelines are expressed in terms of personality types and the range of behavioural indices that are most commonly present in individuals who are successful in these jobs.

Best Fit and Successful Integration

Oftentimes, you or your organization may want to ensure that a new team member smoothly and effectively integrates into the existing team - peers, managers and/or subordinates – and with the organizational culture – whatever the specifics of your particular team and organization may be. Personality assessment with JTPW helps you accomplish this goal by performing the following basic steps:

• conducting personality assessments of the members of the existing team or the individuals the prospective candidate will have to interact with,
• obtaining group's overall personality radar (group personality radar), and then comparing a candidate's or a new hire’s personality radar against the group's overall personality radar, as well as
• comparing against a manager’s Personality Radar, as required, to confirm compatibility or reveal potential conflicts.

New! The unique 1:1 Personality Compatibility Report provides personality compatibility analysis of a pair of respondents and features the personality compatibility potential indicator. The indicator factors in the differences in behavioral traits, their expressiveness, and the differences in personality types of the respondents. The report includes:

• personality compatibility potential indicator
• side-by-side comparison of behavioral scores and personality radars of respondents
• analysis, interpretation and tips on how to prevent potential (or manage the existing) tension and conflict between individuals

Use this report to explore personality compatibility between the prospective and the existing team members or the leader, and develop a successfull integration strategy.

Identify Soft Skill Requirements

JTPW can help you discover and confirm any potentially weak areas of the existing team by completing personality assessments of the existing team members and obtaining a JTPW Group Summary Report. The Group Summary Report allows you to analyze your team as a whole and determine its potentially weak areas in terms of soft skills. Once such “blind spots” are identified, you can incorporate them into new hire requirements or a job posting and then look for a candidate who might bring to the table personality qualities that are be lacking in the team.

For example, by looking at the JTPW Group Personality Radar included in the Group Summary Report you might find that your team’s Rationality index is on the low end. So, you might be looking for a new team member with more expressed Rationality, as it may be relevant to the job.

Purchase a trial pack | Request a free trial | Email this article

Not a hiring manager? Share this article with your company’s management or HR department.

Are you on the other side of the fence? If you are a job candidate or seeking ways to succeed in the workplace, please read this.

 

  Reveal hidden contents

http://www.humanmetrics.com/hr/business/staffdevelopment.aspx

 

In the workplace, it is common to encounter a mix of different personalities, viewpoints, past experiences, expectations, communication issues and conflicts. How can you get such different people to work as an effective team? How do you improve communication? How can you resolve and prevent conflicts? How can you help employees succeed in today’s fast-paced environment? How do you establish an effective work environment? How do you increase workplace productivity and job satisfaction? How do you motivate employees and become a better leader? These are just some examples of the workplace issues that can be effectively addressed once you are equipped with the results of the personality assessment of your employees that is specifically designed for the workplace – the Jung Typology Profiler for Workplace™ (JTPW™) - and the base of it is an understanding of your employees’ personality types and their natural behavioural preferences and gifts.

Jung Typology Profiler for Workplace™ is the professional version of the Jung Typology Test™ that you just took. It is specifically created to address the needs of the workplace and is aimed at organizations and businesses. More info about JTPW™

You and your company can use JTPW™ for:

• Assessing employees’ potentials and optimizing their job responsibilities accordingly
• Assessing the propensity for, and developing and optimizing the use of, leadership skills of your staff
• Conflict Management
• Improving supervisor-subordinate and peer-to-peer work relationship
• Improving teamwork
• Evaluation of candidates for promotion

JTPW™ personality assessments and tools for staff development and team building are offered from our HRPersonality.com website.

Assessing Employee’s Potentials and Optimizing Job Responsibilities

One of the applications of the JTPW™ is the assessment of an employee in order to determine areas and responsibilities where an employee can contribute to their fullest potential and most productively. The JTPW™ also determines an employee’s motivating factors, as well as his or her potential strengths and limitations, in terms of soft skills. An understanding of these aspects of employees’ personalities allows managers to maximize the effectiveness of each individual employee, and the effectiveness of a team as a whole, increase job satisfaction and reduce work-related stress. The ultimate outcome is a greater overall productivity and a decrease in turnover.

Assessing and Developing Leadership Skills

This is another important use of the JTPW™ in the workplace. With JTPW™ you can obtain evaluation of an individual’s propensity for natural leadership talents. The assessment pinpoints an individual’s leadership style and the extent to which he or she is likely to display leadership qualities. Understanding one’s own leadership style allows an employee to make use of his or her natural strengths and recognize potential limitations. The awareness of these strengths and limitations gives a leader the ability to see if any changes might be necessary and take proper steps in that direction.

Effective Working Relationship between Two Employees

The third important application of the JTPW™ is improvement of work relationship involving two employees, such as a manager and his or her subordinate, or two peers working together. With JTPW™ you can assess the propensity for effective collaboration and reveal potential sources of “friction”. The assessment includes analyzing the combination of personality types and several behavioral indices of the individuals involved, and identifying areas of likely concurrence or dissonance. The behavioral indices that scored close in both individuals determine the areas of likely concurrence. The behavioral indices that scored significantly different in both individuals determine the areas of divergence. Depending on a situation areas of divergence may or may not become a source of a conflict. The report produced by JTPW™ includes tips on leveraging areas of concurrence and mitigate potential issues sourcing from areas of divergence, in order to establish the most effective and mutually acceptable working relationship.

New! The unique 1:1 Personality Compatibility Report is offered is now offered to organizations from our HRPersonality.com assessment portal. It provides personality compatibility analysis of a pair of respondents and features the personality compatibility potential indicator. The indicator factors in the differences in behavioral traits, their expressiveness, and the differences in personality types of the respondents. The report includes:

• personality compatibility potential indicator
• side-by-side comparison of behavioral scores and personality radars of respondents
• analysis, interpretation and tips on how to prevent potential (or manage the existing) tension and conflict between individuals

Use this report to explore personality compatibility between the prospective and the existing team members or the leader, between the existing team members, or between the team members and the leader.

Purchase a trial pack | Request a free trial | Improving Teamwork

Personality assessment with JTPW™ can be effectively used to improve teamwork and team productivity when we are talking about teams of two and more employees. An assessment for the purposes of effective teaming includes:

• Identifying the points of concurrence and points of friction between team members as explained in the previous paragraph
• Reviewing Group Personality Radar™ graph that visually represents the strengths of the key workplace-related behavioral qualities of a team, in such categories as leadership, communication, diligence, empathy, rationality and analyticity. Group Personality Radar™ is a useful tool for determining group's likely strengths and potential deficiencies as a whole. Comparing team members’ Personality Radars with a team’s Group Personality Radar™ reveals propensity for compatibility of an individual team member with the behavioral patterns that are dominant within the group. Likewise it may also reveal potential friction between the individual and the group.
• Comparing Personality Radars of the team members with the Personality Radar™ of the team leader, in order to evaluate the degree of cooperation that is likely to occur between the team member and the team leader, and also the degree of tension that may potentially arise in situations of conflict.
• The Group Personality Radar™ also allows for quantitative evaluation of the degree of change in the personality traits within a group in response to changes in the structure of the group – for example, possible effects of adding or removing an individual from the team. You might want to introduce a new member to the team in order to enhance certain behavioral traits of the team as a whole. For example, adding a new team member who scores high on rationality index will increase the rationality of the team as a whole.
• You can also track the changes within the group as the group is put through specific targeted training programs.

Evaluating Candidates for Promotion

Assessment with JTPW™ can be incorporated into your organization’s process of internal promotion and succession planning, and can be used for candidate’s evaluation, including the assessment of their likely effectiveness within a new team, from the soft skills/leadership skills perspective.

For the purposes of such evaluation, the candidate will complete JTPW™ questionnaire and a report called Career Development report will be produced by the system. The Career Development report, among other things, includes several behavioral scores in various areas. The scores are indicative of behavioral preferences and natural gifts the candidate is likely to demonstrate. These scores need then to be analyzed in the context of the requirements of the new job.

In addition, it is recommended to determine and analyze the likely effects of introducing the candidate into an existing team. In order to accomplish this analysis, all individuals that the candidate will actively interact with (or at least the ones with whom it is particularly important to insure smooth interaction), will have to complete personality assessment with JTPW. Using the previously described methodology of assessing work relationship in pairs, you can evaluate how effectively the candidate will likely integrate with specific members of the team or with the team as a whole, and the potential challenges that they may encounter while working together. The results of this analysis can then be used to make specific recommendations to the candidate and the group aimed at effectively integrating the candidate into the team.

HRPersonality.com Personality Assessment Portal

JTPW™ personality assessments and tools for staff development and team building are offered from our HRPersonality.com online assessment centre. Once you open an account with HRPersonality.com, your company be able to access an online assessment portal that you can navigate and manage independently. Through your portal account you will be able to invite your employees and centrally access their results. Results become available online immediately after an employee completes the assessment. Within your assessment portal you will have access to various components of JTPW™ and analyze the results using various methods.

You (or your company’s management or HR department) will obtain JTPW™ reports incorporating analysis and interpretation based on various methods.

One such type of analysis presents an evaluation of the personality traits of the employee in the context of the basic theory of pscychological types of Carl Jung and an additional dimension (judging vs. perceiving) proposed in the theory of Isabel Briggs Myers. Whereas further analysis evaluates the employee in five workplace-focused areas including leadership, communication, diligence, empathy, and rationality/analyticity. The strengths of personality traits are quantified, and the scores are presented in a Personality Radar™ graph. Personality Radar™ allows you to quickly evaluate the unique features of an employee’s personality.

You will also obtain an individualized profile of an employee’s personality, giving you a detailed understanding of his or her traits. This profile includes sections on: the best direction for staff development, decision-making style, conflict resolution style, communication style, potential strengths and weaknesses, and more. Get started now - click here to purchase a trial pack.

Purchase a trial pack | Request a free trial | Email this article

Share this article with your company’s management or HR department.

Looking for tips for you on how to succeed in the workplace? Complete our premium career development assessment.[/spoiler]

Eh. This is really odd. I can't spoiler-tag the fourth long post. Probably the limit of spoiler tags in a post is only three (I can't remember).

Edited May 25, 2013 by Fluffle Puff

[RWB 229]

Introvert(33%)  iNtuitive(12%)  Feeling(38%)  Perceiving(44)%

• You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (33%)
• You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
• You have moderate preference of Feeling over Thinking (38%)
• You have moderate preference of Perceiving over Judging (44%)

 

INFP= Luna.

 

http://typelogic.com/infp.html

[Unpredictable Ranger 696]

More about my personality is what I got from http://www.humanmetrics.com/rot/riskguide.htm:

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

HUMANMETRICS

 

Risk Attitudes Profiler™ Your success in life depends to a large extent on whether your activities suit your character and your personality. In order to succeed in life, you must determine what you should do and what you should avoid doing. For this you must first know yourself. This is difficult to achieve by subjective self-analysis as people tend to see a biased picture of themselves: we often unconsciously attribute to ourselves desirable qualities instead of those actually present and confuse unimportant features of our personality with those that really determine our inclinations, abilities and style of behavior.

The Risk Attitudes Profiler determines the strength of expression of mutually opposed psychological qualities and the relationships between them: on one hand, aspiration for emotional order, peace and safety and on the other, aspiration for "kicks", risk and activity. The proportion of the strengths of these aspirations determines the character of a person and the style of his behavior in life. These two psychological features form the basis of many other personal qualities and are of a fundamental nature, as they stem directly from physiological functions of the brain.

Striving for a condition of comfort and peace (absence of danger) is intrinsic to all humans and animals. Animals arrive at this state when all their life needs are met and nothing threatens them. When there is danger, animals receive signals from special neuron formations in the brain - the so-called centers of negative emotions - which produce feelings of discomfort (hunger, cold, etc.) and emotions of anxiety and fear.

An animal's center of negative emotions or suffering, functions continuously as animals always have to worry about food, shelter, safety etc. In humans, who usually live in an artificially-created comfort environment, these neuron formations, or centers, do not find adequate application for most of the time. However, any physiological system requires a corresponding activity. Insufficient activity of the "center of suffering" compels a person, through certain physiological mechanisms, to actions that are associated with "kicks". Demand for such feelings is expressed differently in different people - from a desire to experience a thrill to thirst for situations and actions associated with risk that can sometimes be life-threatening or lead to antisocial behavior. But as the urge for an emotionally negative feeling, such as danger, is irrational and objectively pointless, it is subconsciously transformed into thirst for something that subjectively makes sense and is expedient (for example, striving for wealth, glory, power, etc.). Demands raised by the centers of negative emotions determine the behavior of a person in society, his drive to succeed, his ability to dare and to overcome obstacles; but the same demands can also lead to dangerous activities and, with persons of a low moral and ethical level, to antisocial and criminal behavior.

The strength of expression and the proportion between the two aspirations - for peace, stability and safety on the one hand, and for negative feelings ("thrills") on the other hand – differ in everyone. Manifestation of these subconscious demands depends also on the objective conditions under which people of different personal types behave. These demands, in the context of other personal qualities, determine to a large extent the individual's system of behavior in varying circumstances and, in the end, the direction of his life.

With the help of this test, you can begin to understand these subconscious demands in yourself. This understanding will weaken the impact of their negative aspects on your personality and strengthen the impact of the positive ones. Such self-knowledge will help you to realize your potential and avoid many mistakes in shaping your future.

 

Results of the test are presented as three blocks. The first block describes the risk balance in terms of the Risk Attitude Index. The Risk Attitude Index is determined as the difference between aspiration for risk and aspiration for safety and stability. This index ranges from 0% to 100% with a mean at 53%. 
Values of the Risk Attitude Index over 85% are typical for people who tend to engage in very risky behavior. Values of the Risk Attitude index below 35% usually mean that the person has increased aspiration for safety and stability.

 

Your Risk Attitude Index 76%

 

Risk Attitude Low
0% - 34% Moderately low
35%-52% Moderate
53% - 74% Moderately high
75%-85% High       
86% - 100% Index

 

The second block of results shows your risk profile, i.e. your risk types and the degree of their expression (in percentages of the maximum possible expression). The statistics show that 20% of those tested exhibit one distinctly expressed risk type (the so-called primary risk type). 70% of those tested exhibit the primary risk type and one or two less expressed (secondary) risk types. The remaining 10% exhibit only the secondary risk type or they cannot be related to any of them at all. Presence of a secondary risk type means that the traits corresponding to this type are revealed only from time to time, and as a rule in a weakly expressed form. About 5% of those tested can only be given a general description of their risky traits because they evenly and weakly exhibit features of three or four risk types. The percentage of a risk type expression reflects the strength and frequency of manifestation of the features that are inherent in the corresponding risk type.

 

Your Risk Type Profile

 

Type Type description Type expression % Primary Type(s)

• Inspired

45% Secondary Type(s)

• Adventurer

32%

 

The third block of test results gives the descriptions of the risk types that are inherent in a given personality. Clicking on the name of the main or secondary type you will get a general description of that risk type and recommendations related to possible ways of personal growth and the strategy for successful behavior. Also listed are the names of historic personalities who displayed the corresponding risk type.

 

Risk profiles of famous personalities 


Descriptions of the risk types:

• <a target="_blank" data-cke-saved-href="http://www.humanmetrics.com/rot/Moralistp.asp" href="http://www.humanmetrics.com/rot/Moralistp.asp" )"="">Moralist
• Toiler
• Rational
• Energetic
• Ponderous
• Adventurer
• Inspired

 

 

Go to the Test RAP users Home

 

 

Terms of Use contact us © 1998-2011 Humanmetrics All rights reserved.

 

 

Edited May 25, 2013 by Fluffle Puff

[SoundRaptured 139]

By the way, wrong. Sherlock Holmes is an INTJ. just throwing that out there, as my bro is an intj and he's always telling me stuff about it. xD

Anyways, I'm INFP as I have stated on previous topics I believe. This means I'm Luna :3

and my brother is INTJ, making him Princess Celestia.

therefor,

I'm Luna, he's Celestia, we're brother princess pony sisters :3 XP

[Fluttershyfan94 5,744]

I had taken this a while ago,  I decided to retake it a few months ago. So yeah I'm INTJ, I would have liked being the same as Fluttershy, I have no idea if this even says anything about me at all.

 

INTJ. Introvert (78%), Intuitive (25%), Thinking (65%), Judging (1%).

• You have strong preference of Introversion over Extraversion (78%)
• You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing (25%)
• You have distinctive preference of Thinking over Feeling (62%)
• You have marginal or no preference of Judging over Perceiving (1%)

[Starswirl the Trixie 975]

  On 2013-05-25 at 8:58 AM, Commander Urdnot said:

Oh, and Apple Bloom is not an ENTP; Discord is an ENTP. I don't know what Apple Bloom is. but she's not ENTP.

 

Shoot me a PM if you're interested in your type, and about this stuff, I love talking to people about it. :w

 

You can probably imagine my disdain when I saw that Twilight was called an INTP.  No, no; she's clearly J and quite possibly S.  IxTJ, not INTP.  We INTPs wouldn't be caught dead making long lists of things to do.

 

Oh, and a quick reminder to everyone: A single online test can't accurately determine MBTI type (and, of course, many feel that people do not fall into the MBTI archetypes, but rather fall on spectrums between them.)  If you want a second opinion besides the Human Metrics test in the OP, I'd recommend this one: http://www.25quiz.com/

Edited May 25, 2013 by Starswirl the Trixie

[Skye Starlight 223]

Last time I took a test like this, which was only a few days ago, I was INFP...

 

Introvert(89%)  Sensing(1%)  Feeling(38%)  Perceiving(56)%

 

What? I changed? I changed my thinking a bit, I guess... Depends on my mood... Apparently the only change is minute in that I barely got sensing.

 

Apparently, when changed from thinking about what I should do to what I would really do, I changed the N to an S... Makes sense seeing as intuitive people are more "up in the clouds" and whilst I am normally there, I have to take into account the down to earth side of me. I tend to be an Auditory learner. Teach me through the world!

 

  Quote

 

ISFPs are the first to hear the different drummer. Many eagerly plunge into new fashions, avant garde experiences, 'hip' trends--some even setting the trends.

 

More in touch with the reality of their senses than their INFP counterparts, ISFPs live in the here and now. Their impulses yearn to be free, and are often loosed when others least expect it. The ISFP who continually represses these impulses feels 'dead inside' and may eventually cut and run. (One ISFP friend has become nonambulatory within the past few years. He will still, on impulse, leave home in the middle of the night and go to Las Vegas or wherever, regardless of the difficulties of his physical condition.)

 

ISFPs may be quite charming and ingratiating on first acquaintance, flowing with compliments which may (or may not) be deserved. On other occasions, the same individual may be aloof and detached. Some ISFP males are fiercely competitive, especially in sport or table games, and may have great difficulty losing. This competitive nature, also seen in other SP types, sometimes fosters 'lucky,' 'gut' feelings and a willingness to take risks.

 

Organized education is difficult for the majority of ISFPs, and many drop out before finishing secondary education. Their interest can be held better through experiential learning, at which many excel. ISFPs will practice playing an instrument or honing a favored skill for hours on end, not so much as practice as for the joy of the experience.

 

What I've put in bold is what I'm like... However, it is good to note that I do go off daydreaming, and I am somewhat philosophical, traits shown by INFP, not ISFP. Looks like I'm somewhere between Fluttershy and Luna! And the only thing tying me to RD is my Loyalty and my Sensing and Perceiving traits...