What's better? Gangnam Style or Harlem Shake?

[Agent505 661]

Gangnam Style. It's just so idiotic and stupid, but it's well done and it doesn't take itself seriously like most songs (and everything else) these days, so it's a nice change of pace. 

Sure, it's overused and it's literally everywhere, but I still listen to it every now and again just for the laughs. 

[ReGen 1,466]

Personally, neither. Gangnam Style was pretty cool at first, but it got old and annoying pretty fast, especially when you hear about it all the dang time.

 

Harlem Shake too.

[Dr. Vojislav Seselj 691]

Harlem Shake got boring in a week.

Gentleman lasted 2-3 months.

Gangnam Style is still going.

 

Easy choice. Gangnam Style any day of the week.

[RedStorm 66]

 

 

I like both... both are stupid.

Though, if I'd have to choose between, I'd choose Gangnam Style. Why? Because it has dance moves that you can actually learn. You don't just have a seizure or hump the air.

 

 

 

 

 

[DITR 180]

Gangnam Style, for the love of god, Gangnam Style. Gangnam Style is actually a song with lyrics and effort put into it. Harlem Shake is just a bunch of dickweeds  humping the air that somehow managed to become the most popular video on youtube in a single day

[sibonny 18]

Gangnam Style.Harlem Shake is basically a 30 seconds song putted on replay...and hey,Korean pop is better than a 30 seconds song without any sense...not like Gangnam have much of it,but at least is catchy and all that.

[SoarinBlue 202]

I danced to both of these at my friend's wedding reception this past weekend. Gangnam style is better as a dance and as a song. Harlem shake is great fun for the first 30-45 seconds, but then its kind of awkward and you dont really know what to do for the rest of the song. Gangnam style you can just keep doing the dance, so its a little more structured and fun to do in a group

[caramba2654 602]

Harlem Shake. Just because my class did it in a school bus with two teachers and because SYNCOPATION IS SOMETHING I LOVE/HATE.