Banned from Equestria

[Flutter's lover <3 8,204]

I played it but as soon as I realized the content...I clicked "Close tab" Though the animation was pretty good.if it was a "clean" game then I would've had more interest in it.

[Dr. Zerkagon 92]

"I've seen people get murdered by machetes, I saw someone commit suicide, i can handle this."

I was wrong.

[John 793]

Meh it's alright. honestly it is just porn

 

People's opinions on how bad "porn" is varies.

Individual opinion may also vary with what type of porn it is.

 

Don't generalize your opinion that porn is universally morally justified.

 

 

"I've seen people get murdered by machetes, I saw someone commit suicide, i can handle this."

I was wrong.

 

Okay, I have a big problem with this.  Watching an innocent person be murdered for your own amusement shows that you have little to no respect for their life or death.  That person probably had a life worth living and you are watching them die a horrible death all for a few minutes of your entertainment.  That makes me sick.  How has society gotten this f@#cked up?

 

Then again you could be joking.  If so, no biggie.

Edited December 23, 2013 by John

[Malinter 3,064]

I've never seen it beyond the thumbnails on youtube. I kinda figured what it was just from the name alone and the 'strategic' censoring in said thumbnails. XD

[SanityNotIncluded 335]

I've watched others play it. I enjoy seeing others freak out over it.

 

Trust me though, there are worse things on the internet.

[Dr. Zerkagon 92]

People's opinions on how bad "porn" is varies.

Individual opinion may also vary with what type of porn it is.

 

Don't generalize your opinion that porn is universally morally justified.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Okay, I have a big problem with this.  Watching an innocent person be murdered for your own amusement shows that you have little to no respect for their life or death.  That person probably had a life worth living and you are watching them die a horrible death all for a few minutes of your entertainment.  That makes me sick.  How has society gotten this f@#cked up?

 

Then again you could be joking.  If so, no biggie.

I do not in any way find these videos amusing, but I'm also joking.

I have seen these videos, but only because of my friend's dodgy links to "le mastr trole" me.

 

But yes, the gore videos are actually worse, but I was just fooling around.

[SilverStarApple 849]

I have yet to beat Rainbow Dash in the race.

 

The race has an odd hidden meaning, though: The red OC Pony guy is so great, he can out-fly Rainbow Dash after getting wings that day?

 

...And even then, she can only beat him if he takes the cloud'd obstacle course, while she freely flies in a straight line beside it? And even with him constantly dodging, he can still beat her as long as he doesn't get stuck in any clouds?

[The Soldier 2,043]

I love that game. Not just because of its content, but also because of the objective.

 

It's sort of a puzzle game where you're apparently supposed to find a way to have sex with all of the ponies, including Trixie, Vinyl, er... all that other stuff. What's the kick? You have to do 'em in a specific order to complete the whole pony-set thing. Of course, once you figured out that order, it's gonna stay that way... :|

 

Gotta screw 'em all!

 

So if you're into puzzles and aren't gonna be one of those kids who gets "traumatized for life", I suggest you go try it.

Edited December 24, 2013 by Psyche Clops

[FNGRpony 655]

I've been on the internet since I was like 14, so I've learned to spot shit that's better left untouched from a mile away, I thankfully knew of this games reputation and never had the misfortune of venturing into it....

 

...and If I do click something I wish i could unsee, I have no one to blame but myself because I probably took the smuck bait. 

I'll have you know shit has prioity and first class citzen ship on the internet.

 

the internet is an excuse to indulge in shit.

['Fluttershy' 51]

I can only seem to get Fluttershy and Pinkie Pie :/

[FNGRpony 655]

People's opinions on how bad "porn" is varies.

Individual opinion may also vary with what type of porn it is.

 

Don't generalize your opinion that porn is universally morally justified.

 

 

 

 

Okay, I have a big problem with this.  Watching an innocent person be murdered for your own amusement shows that you have little to no respect for their life or death.  That person probably had a life worth living and you are watching them die a horrible death all for a few minutes of your entertainment.  That makes me sick.  How has society gotten this f@#cked up?

 

Then again you could be joking.  If so, no biggie.

 

um gotten to?  People use to go to public hangings and excutions back in the dark ages.

 

what do you mean got to?

 

[TorqueEffect 112]

Played it. Animation was decent, and the gameplay was quite fun, and for a smut game it was actually entertaining between the porn.

Can't say I enjoy full on porn, I am more of a soft-core porn kinda guy.

 

Now I am not going to force my opinion. But some of you are a bit uptight, looking at it like it is the bane of this fandom, people thinking this is why we are made fun of. To be quite honest, it is actually the few weirdos in this fandom they pick out at conventions and point at and say we are all like that, that is the bulk of why we get made fun of. Don't pretend it is all the porn's fault. The porn is just a side thing to pick at.

[John 793]

um gotten to?  People use to go to public hangings and excutions back in the dark ages.

 

what do you mean got to?

 

 

Do you not want to steer humanity in the right direction by deciding that these things are wrong?  Does it really matter how I worded that last sentence?

 

The death of an innocent person who was forcibly taken from their lives to be brutally tortured and slaughtered on camera is also quite different from the death of a public figure by guillotine/hanging in an era where such a thing was to be expected.  Nonetheless, people attending executions usually had a good reason to be aligned against the person being executed (for example if they were an enemy of the state).

[FNGRpony 655]

Do you not want to steer humanity in the right direction by deciding that these things are wrong?  Does it really matter how I worded that last sentence?

 

The death of an innocent person who was forcibly taken from their lives to be brutally tortured and slaughtered on camera is also quite different from the death of a public figure by guillotine/hanging in an era where such a thing was to be expected.  Nonetheless, people attending executions usually had a good reason to be aligned against the person being executed (for example if they were an enemy of the state).

 

As a history major graduate is there a polite way i could laugh?

 

How by shaming people on a message board?  I had a pro choice advocate defeat me utterly by one simply phrase.

Ready for it?  Do you care after it's born?  

And to quote digi, context if everything.  I'm not going to ride you for your wording error,

feel free to re word yourself.

 

Let me ask you this?  Who are you to say who deserves to live and dies?  See I conceed I am either A a bad person, or B more likely than not a bad person.   We are a the civilation who watcheds 1000 ways to die and laughs.  and before that it was faces of death, before that public excuations.

 

where does this entirely undeserved faith in humanity come from?

To quote mel brooks,

tragidy is when i stub my toe,

comedy is when you fall down break your neck and die.  the further the tragedy gets away from myself the funnier it gets.

Those are words from one of our best comedic writers known to man.

[John 793]

As a history major graduate is there a polite way i could laugh?

 

How by shaming people on a message board?  I had a pro choice advocate defeat me utterly by one simply phrase.

Ready for it?  Do you care after it's born?  

And to quote digi, context if everything.  I'm not going to ride you for your wording error,

feel free to re word yourself.

 

Let me ask you this?  Who are you to say who deserves to live and dies?  See I conceed I am either A a bad person, or B more likely than not a bad person.   We are a the civilation who watcheds 1000 ways to die and laughs.  and before that it was faces of death, before that public excuations.

 

where does this entirely undeserved faith in humanity come from?

To quote mel brooks,

tragidy is when i stub my toe,

comedy is when you fall down break your neck and die.  the further the tragedy gets away from myself the funnier it gets.

Those are words from one of our best comedic writers known to man.

 

Rude..

 

 

You must mean to support such barbaric occurrences then.  By all means, if that is your choice, be my guest.  Otherwise, arguing with my post is pointless.  You merely want to reinforce your identity as a history buff...

Edited December 25, 2013 by John

[FNGRpony 655]

You must mean to support such barbaric occurrences then.  By all means, if that is your choice, be my guest.  Otherwise, arguing with my post is pointless.  You merely want to reinforce your identity as a history buff...

If i may.

 

you call them barbaric occurences as if their isolated incidents.  Now i don't watch public excutations.  But it's a society norm, in the past, and in the present world.  Me stating i'm a history "buff" isn't to brag, it's to qualify where i'm refuting "how bad society has gotten."

 

you climbed to his moral high groud that has never existed and man (or woman) be willing never will.

 

Now i didn't personally sit aroud and watch excutations for fun.  my prefered sport is seeing two grown men (or women) locked in a cage and try and cure the other person of coincessness, because i fine the idea of two grown men or more playing with a ball boring.

 

A capatlist (which capatilism is the height of civilization) society has deemed this well and proper thank you very much.

What dictates barbic nature has nothing to do with cruelty, or death silly philly.

 

It's profit.

I'm sure if i may assume you find reality is all very sad, 

and to which i would than reply, that's very noble, idealistic, and adorable.

 

History is on my side, so much so even if you could find a culture that wasn't "barbic" it would in fact be the anomally.

 

Barbisim is using out dated and under developed means by performed an act.  It has nothing to do with right or wrong.

 

But if you'd like to rephrase, it's fine.

[John 793]

If i may.

 

you call them barbaric occurences as if their isolated incidents.  Now i don't watch public excutations.  But it's a society norm, in the past, and in the present world.  Me stating i'm a history "buff" isn't to brag, it's to qualify where i'm refuting "how bad society has gotten."

 

As a history major graduate is there a polite way i could laugh?

 

Anyone who flaunts their undergraduate degree from an unfamiliar university for the purpose of arguing online likely has an agenda that involves proving their intellectual worth to others...  If you want to cherry-pick my paragraph and interpret in a way that allows you to assume that I am insisting on historical inaccuracys instead of interpreting it in the way that is relevant to the topic, be my guest.  I had established long ago that human society in general has always engaged in such hideous practices.  Nonetheless, the phrase "what has society gotten to" can convey countless different meanings.  It doesn't have to be with respect to human society from a historical perspective that spans from the dawn of man until this day.

 

Your following response was snide and insinuated a response just as presumptuous and assuming as your own.

 

you climbed to his moral high groud that has never existed and man (or woman) be willing never will.

 

The "moral high ground" lies in the fact that I am willing to challenge the societal norm of disrespect for human life on an individual level.  It would be reasonable to assume (after your most recent post) that you, challenge this norm as well (although in a much more indirect level that entitles refraining from participation in such acts of disrespecting human life).  Not only do I refrain from such practices, but I actually seek to teach others that such practices are heinous and highly immoral.

 

Instead of straying from the topic of the post to an even greater extent, how about abandoning the spirit of verbal literalism and discovering the true meaning of my post?  You culled a specific sentence of mine (which was vulnerable in the hands of an overbearing historian) and interpreted it in a way that allowed you to create a historical debate.

 

It's profit.

I'm sure if i may assume you find reality is all very sad, 

and to which i would than reply, that's very noble, idealistic, and adorable.

 

"That's very noble of you.  I'll write to you when you're banished."

 

So I would find it reasonable to assume that it is because of people with this mindset ^ that society cannot progress past such inhumane practices. And yes, I do find much of reality "sad," however I am willing to acknowledge the possibility of a global enlightenment with respect to endorsing human rights.

You assuming my beliefs to be cute in a concealed attempt to demean me has no affect on my self-image nor does it persuade me to challenge my idealistic attitude and my aim to improve the world through the scorning of acts which deprive humanity of compassion.

http://thesaurus.com/browse/adorable

 

Bleh!  That was a mouthful!

 

 

 

 

Those are words from one of our best comedic writers known to man.

 

One of the* best.  Not one of our best.  Our best known to man?  The best known to man.

Also, way to quote a comedian in search of a meaningful remark about humanity...

 

 

How by shaming people on a message board?

 

So hypocritical.

 

 

I'm not going to ride you for your wording error, feel free to re word yourself.

 

That's what you started this over.  Wording.

 

 

where does this entirely undeserved faith in humanity come from?

 

It's about time... -.-

 

 

Merry Christmas *

Edited December 25, 2013 by John

[FNGRpony 655]

Vs someone who completely talked out of what exactly?

 

snide or not it doesn't make it any less valid.

if you made a snow man and thought it was surivie the summer, and i told you in a real jerk way it woulnd't,

i wouldn't be any less right.

 

So i see your effective defense to my so called cherry picking it pad your argument.  ^^.

 

As for it being highly immoral based on what?

fantasy books?  no seriously, point blank hit me a culture that supports your hypothsis.  I already thought of one, and their not doing to well, (there's that snide ness).

 

I'm a terible person, your pretending to be good.  See how that works?  

 

I'm still waiting for the correction

 

Allow me to retort, God had to send his only son so humanity could be forgiven for his inherit evil.

Merry check, christmas and mate.

 

A concealed attempted?

you do realize the name is For No good reason, how blunt do i have to be?

You began this whole lecture because you disapproved of someone being entertained on suffering.

 

Lets take a look at MLP, some people watch the show because the slice of life problems are wrecked with just that.

 

Party of one, Lesson 0, pff the lessons you can take from these episodes are you don't even have to torcher people, they'll do it to them selves.

 

 

 

 

Anyone who flaunts their undergraduate degree from an unfamiliar university for the purpose of arguing online likely has an agenda that involves proving their intellectual worth to others...  If you want to cherry-pick my paragraph and interpret in a way that allows you to assume that I am insisting on historical inaccuracys instead of interpreting it in the way that is relevant to the topic, be my guest.  I had established long ago that human society in general has always engaged in such hideous practices.  Nonetheless, the phrase "what has society gotten to" can convey countless different meanings.  It doesn't have to be with respect to human society from a historical perspective that spans from the dawn of man until this day.

 

Your following response was snide and insinuated a response just as presumptuous and assuming as your own.

 

 

 

The "moral high ground" lies in the fact that I am willing to challenge the societal norm of disrespect for human life on an individual level.  It would be reasonable to assume (after your most recent post) that you, challenge this norm as well (although in a much more indirect level that entitles refraining from participation in such acts of disrespecting human life).  Not only do I refrain from such practices, but I actually seek to teach others that such practices are heinous and highly immoral.

 

Instead of straying from the topic of the post to an even greater extent, how about abandoning the spirit of verbal literalism and discovering the true meaning of my post?  You culled a specific sentence of mine (which was vulnerable in the hands of an overbearing historian) and interpreted it in a way that allowed you to create a historical debate.

 

 

"That's very noble of you.  I'll write to you when you're banished."

 

So I would find it reasonable to assume that it is because of people with this mindset ^ that society cannot progress past such inhumane practices. And yes, I do find much of reality "sad," however I am willing to acknowledge the possibility of a global enlightenment with respect to endorsing human rights.

You assuming my beliefs to be cute in a concealed attempt to demean me has no affect on my self-image nor does it persuade me to challenge my idealistic attitude and my aim to improve the world through the scorning of acts which deprive humanity of compassion.

http://thesaurus.com/browse/adorable

 

Bleh!  That was a mouthful!

 

 

 

 

 

 

One of the* best.  Not one of our best.  Our best known to man?  The best known to man.

Also, way to quote a comedian in search of a meaningful remark about humanity...

 

 

 

 

So hypocritical.

 

 

 

 

That's what you started this over.  Wording.

 

 

 

 

It's about time... -.-

 

 

Merry Christmas *

 

Edited December 25, 2013 by FNGRpony

[skysweep 541]

Woah you two, lets not get so hostile, shall we? Ok. Dont hit me with a sledgehammer for putting my two bits into your argument, I just want to point out a few things.

 

Alright John, its real noble of you to think of your morals first and foremost, and I respect that. I do agree that the world is getting a little more messed up, as my understanding of the idea is that the difference between the public hangings of past and the "entertainment" of today is the fact enjoyment has entered the field. In the past, it used to be that the person had done something wrong, and it was a means to accept the loss of something due to that person. And today, your view is that it moved to sadism. Totally fine with that. 

 

I know you wish to change people's mindset to being one of more kindness and consideration, I am doing the same but in a different topic. But you have to understand that in my differing opinion, that death for entertainment can be seen as a manner of showing superiority. That one is better as they are able to cause hurt to others, so you better obey. And so long as there is a struggle to be the top dog, which there always will be(communism's goal in this manner was a joke in my view) killing humans for no reason other then being unlucky or being on the wrong side.

 

FNGRpony, I agree with the fact that we have to accept that this seemingly barbaric manner is something that is part of humans as long as we had civilization. I also see why you retort in such a manner, because in a supposedly free society, one should not be targeted for having a different opinion. I have no issue with your....interests, as it does not encompass the death of a person for fun.

 

But people have to try to move forward. This is the fact of life in a society and progress. That we have to accept the horrid things that happens, and say, "never again." (You know what I am referring to) But if we do not move forward, we will stagnate. Just sitting around in a what we call "barbaric" culture, never progressing beyond the basic rules all animals are born with. It might be a fact, but we need to change it to move forward. And it has to start somewhere, might as well be here. 

[Nouva 4]

Back to the topic posted (as we should be)

 

I've played it, kinda liked it. There is better and worse animations/games out there (both clean and NSFW) So here is my review of the game from a mechanical (I guess you would say) stand point.

Graphics: decent but I will say I found the"hand drawn" feel appealing

Music: varied and fluid enough to be enjoyable

Game: even though there is a most efficient way the game does fully invite you to explore as you see fit

Plot: from a story standpoint it is kind of weak (but being both a work in progress and a rule 34 game it is understandable) though I do find the idea of turning into a pony interesting

 

Overall if you do not mind or like rule 34I would put this as a recommendation

Edited December 26, 2013 by Nouva

[_~Soaring Heart~_ 45]

I liked the game. Everybrony should play it. 

 

Reaction to everything in the quote above me: 

Edited December 26, 2013 by .:Dash:.

[Nouva 4]

." data-cid="2148286" data-time="1388094891">

Reaction to everything in the post above me: 

To each their own opinion. Though I did attempt to keep the post as close to the programming function s of the game than focus on the content there of.

[_~Soaring Heart~_ 45]

Are you meaning the post literally above my last? Sorry if you did. I meant the quote. Terribly sorry. 

[Nouva 4]

." data-cid="2148322" data-time="1388095900">

Are you meaning the post literally above my last? Sorry if you did. I meant the quote. Terribly sorry. 

No problem just a simple miss wording, no need to apologize (I'm not a member of the Grammar Nazis SS unit )

[The Soldier 2,043]

." data-cid="2148286" data-time="1388094891">

Reaction to everything in the quote above me:

Oh, quit crying already, dammit. You're not dead from the game, and your over-reactions annoys some people. Edited December 27, 2013 by Psyche Clops