Does Twilight Sparkle deserve a star on Hallowood's walk?

[ManaMinori 4,144]

Tinkerbell has one. (No doubt Mickey has one, too). Is Twilight Sparkle (or the "mane6" as a whole) deserve a star in Hollywood's walk of fame?

[Luminance 2,183]

Definitely sure. She can take Donald Trump's spot on the walk for all that matters.

[PiratePony 8,473]

Tinkerbell and Mickey deserve a walk on the Hollywood WOF, due to decades of entertainment and thousands of fans.

 

Twilight, and any MLP character for that matter, is bush league compared to Mickey Mouse.

[Brony Number 42 10,045]

A cartoon character doesn't need to be there. The creator or the actor, sure.

[ManaMinori 4,144]

A cartoon character doesn't need to be there. The creator or the actor, sure.

so Tinkerbell and Mickey shouldn't have theirs, either?

[Mesme Rize 15,681]

Tinker Bell was a character in Peter Pan from 1953 and has become some sort of an icon over the last 6 decades, being recognized by Millions and Millions of people all over the world.

 

Twilight, as much as i like her, dosen't even have a bit of the status, that tinkerbell, Mickey Mouse or even Donald Duck have. If she gains more recognition in the next 40 years, we talk again.

[Brony Number 42 10,045]

so Tinkerbell and Mickey shouldn't have theirs, either?

Not if it were my decision.

[Red Cedar 1,408]

Tara Strong deserves a star on the Walk of Fame. Twilight Sparkle does not.

 

Mickey Mouse was granted a star fifty years after his creation, and is still instantly recognizable today, forty years after that. Tinker Bell is likewise instantly recognizable because Disney used her as a backup mascot for a number of decades, and her star was only added in 2010. The other animated characters on the walk are those that also had lasting impacts. In fact, the only two that had perhaps the shortest span of years, but no less popularity, and have stars are Shrek and the Rugrats. MLP is huge, but still has a long way to go before it could justify putting any of its characters on a star.