Love and tolerate?

[Despair 114]

I see everywhere, that bronies are supposed to love and tolerate things. Why do they say that?

Personally, I can not believe in this saying. I do not love most living things and I can not tolerate most of the things around me (internet and irl).

But that's just me. I want to know what you think about this "Love and tolerate" stuff.

[LimeZest 8]

Love and tolerate: yes.

 

Why the eff not? I mean, sure, you could go off on a nihilist rant about how nothing really matters, but at the end of the day, being happy feels better than being unhappy (by definition).

[False Perception 482]

I agree with the tolerate. South Park made a good point. You should tolerate things, but you shouldn't have to accept something you don't want to. A lot of our fandom are way too defensive about liking MLP.

 

You should add a, "partially" option up there in the poll.

Edited July 20, 2012 by DoubleFrenzyWithCheese

[Tenshinohana 264]

Even tho it might feel stupid to not defend yourself in certain times (like when you're provoked by a troll), in the end the best way is to love and tolerate.

OFC this doesn't count if your life is in danger and you have to defend yourself. But then you have to think "Can you live with the guilt"...

I'd still pick Love and tolerate.

[Leo dash 79]

love and tolerate cuz why keep the hate going?

[Titan Rising 2,156]

Love the person, don't blindly tolerate their actions

[TheEngineer 188]

Definitely, one of my personal moral guiding stars in life is simply to try and love all sentient creatures. I take that very seriously because I think it requires us to revise our understandings of justice and quite a few other concepts.

I realize it is just a line from one of the most heart-warming and awesome TV shows, but I still think it is true in different ways.

[WhiteLightning 339]

Well, sort of. Although the message behind it is a good one and more loving and tolerating is necesaary in modern society, far too many people use it as an excuse to hate on others.

I've seen people anger haters more than once and when the hater does finally snap, simply tell him to 'learn to love and tolerate' instead of actually loving and tolerating him like we bronies say we have to do.

 

 

TL;DR: Far too many people use it as an excuse instead of using it like a sort of moral guiding.

Edited July 20, 2012 by WhiteLightning

[False Perception 482]

Love the person, don't blindly tolerate their actions

 

And would you love him if he was a murderer? You wouldn't have to. You would have to in a sense tolerate it though, because as long as we exist of a "higher" intelligence, we will always fight.

[Rainbow Dash Loyalty 1,275]

I'd rather love and tolerate with a reason, not just because I have to for a show.

[TheEngineer 188]

And would you love him if he was a murderer? You wouldn't have to. You would have to in a sense tolerate it though, because as long as we exist of a "higher" intelligence, we will always fight.

 

I think there are a number of considerations that have to be taken in this case.

1. How do you know he is a murderer? Even if the person had a fair trial, one has to be cautious in saying that a particular event happened in the past. Trials are all about reconstructing what actually happened, we will never, for sure, know who is guilty and who is not because we cannot directly access the past.

2. Even if he did indeed murder someone, is it not worth it to try and understand the person's reasons for doing so and the thoughts which led them to it?

3. Does the suffering of the guilty really solve anything? How does it ameliorate what already happened?

4. Does this act take away from the person's humanity? If we are serious about loving humanity, should we not try and have compassion on this person?

[Bendy 1,821]

Unless the person is seriously threatening your life or your rights then "Hate And Untolerate" the person.

 

Otherwise to brush off whatever they say like sea off rocks.

Edited July 20, 2012 by Rush

[False Perception 482]

-snip a pretty smart post-

 

1-He is. This is hypothetical. It is proven he is.

2-It was unprovoked.

3-We aren't speaking of that, but that is another topic entirely.

4-Refer to 3.

 

Your points stray off topic a tad, since I speak of not this one person's morality, but of the greater good. You only focused on one of my points. I'm saying that you have to put up with the fact that there will be fighting and we can't change that. I'm also saying that though you can't change that, you don't have to like it, which is why I agree with HALF of the motto.

[PlNKlE PIE 364]

To an extent... The phrase originated as a troll repellent and that's still all it is. It was never intended to be adopted as a life motto. It also contradicts what Fluttershy learned about being a pushover; if you tolerate everything then you will surely become a doormat.

[nonee 130]

Maybe the idea is more of a love "or" tolerate thing. Ether accept it or ignore it. To an extent any way. Least that's how I always thought of it

[Finesthour 7,287]

I believe in it as a moral code. You SHOULD live that way.

Sadly, people do not, which includes bronies.

It died long ago.

[TheEngineer 188]

1-He is. This is hypothetical. It is proven he is.

2-It was unprovoked.

3-We aren't speaking of that, but that is another topic entirely.

4-Refer to 3.

 

Your points stray off topic a tad, since I speak of not this one person's morality, but of the greater good. You only focused on one of my points. I'm saying that you have to put up with the fact that there will be fighting and we can't change that. I'm also saying that though you can't change that, you don't have to like it, which is why I agree with HALF of the motto.

 

Good points, I'm sorry that I get a little carried away on the topic of justice; its a favorite of mine.

Regardless, I definitely understand your reasoning. At first, certainly, it seems strange to love everyone, even those who don't love others or those who have committed heinous crimes. Personally, I would agree, we don't have to love everyone in a personal way and it makes good sense not to in many cases! Perhaps love isn't the word I'm looking for here so much as it is compassion. In that case, I definitely agree with you; though I would add the caveat that we should have compassion for all people.

Edited July 20, 2012 by TheEngineer

[Juggler 345]

I think that you should at least try to solve problems by love and tolerance. If that doesn't work, well. You tried.

[Thyflesh 35]

Love and tolerate for me = yes and no.

 

I will show everyone love, however I would not tolerate heretic's within my own faith.

 

This is the only exception however

[thegoodhen 698]

Lots of haters hate because they are sad for some reason. Hate just encourages more hate. I've read many stories about haters turned into brony because of the idea of love and tolerance. So-Love and tolerance 4ever! (On the other hand, we can't tolerate literally everything-but tolerating stuff that doesn't hurt anyone is always the best choice).

[Mr. Jaguar 1,403]

I have very little desire to love someone who is treating my like dirt. I believe people should strive to be make this a loving and tolerating society, but I really don't think anyone should have to feel love for those who act the opposite of this, examples : abusers, rapists, bullies.

Edited July 20, 2012 by Pegasus25

[Thyflesh 35]

I have very little desire to love someone who is treating my like dirt. I believe people should strive to be make this a loving and tolerating society, but I really don't think anyone should have to feel love for those who act the opposite of this, examples : abusers, rapists, bullies.

 

True, but if everyone followed this then eventually no one would love anyone?

 

People change if some people show them a little love.

[Mr. Jaguar 1,403]

I think there are a number of considerations that have to be taken in this case.

1. How do you know he is a murderer? Even if the person had a fair trial, one has to be cautious in saying that a particular event happened in the past. Trials are all about reconstructing what actually happened, we will never, for sure, know who is guilty and who is not because we cannot directly access the past.

2. Even if he did indeed murder someone, is it not worth it to try and understand the person's reasons for doing so and the thoughts which led them to it?

I agree on trying to understand why the person committed murder in the first place, but usually you can tell whether or not the person had a good reason from the get go. Like, raping a murdering a child. There's not a chance in hell the person had a good reason for that.

 

3. Does the suffering of the guilty really solve anything? How does it ameliorate what already happened?

With vengeance, it's just to feel good knowing the bad person who wronged you or someone you loved has suffered for their what they did.

 

4. Does this act take away from the person's humanity? If we are serious about loving humanity, should we not try and have compassion on this person?

 

I think the guy who locked up his daughter for years in an underground room beneath his home so that he could rape her repeatedly, and who wouldn't let any of the children he had with her who were sick get medical attention, should no longer be considered nor treated like a human being.

 

True, but if everyone followed this then eventually no one would love anyone?

 

People change if some people show them a little love.

 

It really depends on the person. For example, a sociopath will not stop being a sociopath by showing him love and kindness. Some people are just evil and nothing will change them. I think love and tolerance should be reserved for people who are also willing to be loving and tolerating, you don't get to walk around being a complete bastard to other people and get treated with love and caring.

[Thyflesh 35]

 

 

It really depends on the person. For example, a sociopath will not stop being a sociopath by showing him love and kindness. Some people are just evil and nothing will change them. I think love and tolerance should be reserved for people who are also willing to be loving and tolerating, you don't get to walk around being a complete bastard to other people and get treated with love and caring.

 

I disagree with this, not being nice to people just because there not nice and not giving people a chance to change doesn't help anyone. It makes you act mean and they never change.

 

And even for a sociopath can be shown love, by getting them help ect.

[False Perception 482]

Love and tolerate for me = yes and no.

 

I will show everyone love, however I would not tolerate heretic's within my own faith.

 

This is the only exception however

 

Personally I think once someone reveals that they are a heretic, than they remove themselves from a religion. Most religions are very vague though, so everyone could interpret it differently. I'm confuzzled as to what your definition of heretic is here. But, this is an off-topic post so feel free to disregard as the Great Moderator Flame Of Awesome blazes through.