TwilizzleFoShizzle

The only advantage desktops have over laptops right now is their upgradability and the ability to cool much more power-heavy components, and with the all in one you sacrifice that, which basically gives you the immobility of a desktop with the inupgradability and power lack of a laptop. No bueno.

1̶̵̨̤̪͕̙̑̄̎ͬ̓̂ͣ̊͛ͧ͑̔ͧ́͝2̷̺͉̮̯͖͔̣̳͎̘̯̹͖̤̣̠ͩͫ̃̏͐̆ͤ̓̈́͊̈́̄̍ͤ̐͗͡

But they look just like M&M's and should be treated as such, a.k.a. a delicious part of any special brownie mix, especially if said brownie mix is expected to be special half an hour after consumption.

I tried this and got my dick stuck in a tree

I play bass guitar, have been playing for about 9 or 10 months with private lessons, if you would like to discuss further you can chat with me on skype, name is watamacha32 I can imagine a lot of people will be attempting to get bass guitar parts, so if you would like to see some of my playing we could arrange that through skype. I know a decent amount of music theory and could probably write some bass lines or something. also, what do conductors even do, we can't really play live because of people living to far away and because of the latency of, say, a group video call on google+ or skype.

add me on skype, my skype account name is watamacha32. I can help a bit with some of the musical part of it, if you would like. What, pray tell, is the song about?

Welcome to the internet. You must be new here In all honesty I agree that the portrayal of women in modern media is outrageous, but I don't really see any way for them to fix it. The way the world is right now, any attempts to shift this portrayal to something less idealistic would create upheaval because it is the portrayal people have looked upon since the advent of such media. Usually this will just result in flipping to a different channel on TV or something of the sort. The media is forcing people to have this perception, and the people are pressuring media into giving them this perception. its a vicious cycle.

•favorite pony: Twilight •youtube account: watamacha32 •what you want to do and a reason why you should: Narrate, because I can do one of those cool 70's porno narrator voices (not sure if there is a better way to put that...) •Skype account: watamacha32 (name should show as "Charlie Sheen" or "Sos") •email: watamacha32@gmail.com •some personal information: I like trainz :3. I play bass guitar and play tf2 and do school stuff and have cool hair

and we still have a volume down button. The music may be louder at a set volume level but that doesn't mean it can't be turned down. I see how they sound different, I'm just confused as to the technical difference between them.

oh okay, I misread. If I understand correctly, you're reffering to the inherent dissonance of most commonly recognized dubstep, would this be fair to say? well if it has nothing to do with the popularity of the song then what is the difference between dubstep and brostep? I went back and looked at your original post but real dubstep is not random at all, and you can't claim a song is loud because its volume is entirely dependent on the person who plays the song back and through what device it is played back.

Not true in the least, it still follows most basic guidelines of music theory for what is generally agreed upon as "good music", I.E. in the song "Scatta" by Skrillex (arguably rap and dubstep at the same time but for these purposes the example is accurate enough) follows the G harmonic minor with its "wubwub" part and the entire song demonstrates no strange magical witchcraft that denies the guidelines of music theory. What you percieve as being non-harmonic (more technically known as dissonant) is the augmented 7 of the scale, coupled with the fact that it is major to begin with, making the scale musically correct but designed to elicit unease in the audience. The only good example of what you are describing would be white noise, brown noise, or pink noise, which I think you'll find sound far less organized than dubstep. Dubstep songs are still musical to the same extent, if not more so, than any other type of song, but the use of uncommon scales, such as harmonic minor, make it seem strange to the untrained ear.

Funny that you would use Bangarang as an example, and then some random dude I don't think many people have heard of as an example of "good" dubstep. My answer to the topic at hand is that people do not dislike dubstep music, but outwardly dismiss it because they feel more original when they do so, and in the modern world we are conditioned to be happy if we recognize ourselves as being individual and having abnormal opinions. Theoretically most people like dubstep and almost nobody states it, but people still assume the people around them like it because their subconscious opinion is that dubstep is good, so they presume that to be the outward opinion of others, and as such express a contradictory outward opinion. Since people expect less around them to know about that random guy you used as an example of "good" dubstep, they are less likely to think that those around the have any opinion at all, and as such they can express their true opinions without having to make modifications in order to feel less "mainstream." Bangarang does, in fact, demonstrate a lot of great instances of "good" sound as it would be made by an instrument other than a computer in the sense that it follows what is generally agreed upon to be a pleasing beat pattern and follows some variation of the twelve tone system. If you claim some random dude is better than Skrillex, then although this opinion may be plausible, it is generally not given because the music is genuinely better but because it is not subconsciously seen by your mind as "mainstream."

I considered all of the legitimately important aspects of this and I think that all joking aside I would definetely take the opportunity, since I have a means of dying after you know the whole sun exploding thing. Anyways one interesting factor is rather important to me.... I would have thousands of years to perfect my image so I could get all the ladies. I would also have thousands of years to generate bank account interest and get a LOT of money. I could basically live for thousands of years doing non-stop partying, and since diseases dont affect me I CAN DO WHATEVER I WANT. I could eat the brains of a kuru diseased Papau New Guinean! If I got bored I could always bring the world to its knees by using my trillions of dollars to buy a bunch of heavy weaponry and use it to bring down a bunch of government figures, and they would be powerless to stop me because I would be immortal! Then once humanity is ripped to shreds I could do the psychological suicide thing, or have some fun using the leftover ICBMs from humanity.