Castle Bleck

That actually sounds quite bad@$$ for some reason, IMO.

I haven't even seen most, if not all, of your threads, TBH.

But I definitely don't "unwant" you; I've actually responded to several of your posts that I have seen.

I've seen you on here for a while, and you don't strike me as hateworthy.

On today's episode of "What is the fandom butthurt about today?"...

And the saga goes on.

Sounds like quite the consolation prize after the... mixed reception... that was Batman V Superman.

I'm closer to the conservative side, and even I hope he ends up becoming the Democratic candidate.

Dixie Carter has to give up the majority of her shares and she is too much of an egomaniac to do that move.

Unless the others end up getting a judge to block her voting power on grounds of incompetence and mismanagement.

How can TNA save itself? 

Obama bailout?

Keep up the good work, Dixie.

Short version:

How did no one beat me to ^it?

I've been to the funerals of 2 great-grandmothers and 2 grandfathers myself.

So I know the feeling.

even if i was angry with the product and cancel my sub, it wouldn't even make a dent in Mcmahons wallet.

Except that countless people have already unsubscribed, the ratings keep failing, and he's lost almost half of his entire fortune by now.

Then again, it's been said that he'd "rather make a dollar off his own idea than a million dollars off someone else's idea," so even the threat of bankruptcy probably wouldn't deter him.

The Board and the other shareholders will probably end up having to file an injunction against his voting power -- on grounds of incompetence -- in order to finally get proper changes made around there.

Vince especially booked himself into a corner with Shane Vs. 'Taker.

If Shane had won, then the fans would've been upset about 'Taker then being 22-2 against someone who technically isn't even a wrestler (despite still being talented in the ring, don't get me wrong).

And since 'Taker won, all of that buildup about Shane potentially controlling Raw was completely pointless, and now we just have yet another year of The Aizen-thority -- and, consequently, even more low ratings -- to look forward to.

Considering that I have this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asperger_syndrome

...WAD and AAM both sort of hit home for me.

Whatcha' gonna do when Applemania comes down on you, brother?!?!

At least she most likely has a much better finisher.

I swear that that Sombra face wants to eat me.

Okay, that was... quite the mouthful.

Bloody brilliant.

And with that, the only real problem I had with The Crystalling can finally be put to rest.

He also had an appearance in the Hulk Hogan movie "No holds barred" which is one of those movies that are so bad, that they are good *blushes as he looked at the blu-ray in his shelf*

WHAT'S THAT SMELL, BROTHER?!?!?!

3) Triple H vs The Undertaker Hell in a Cell(Wrestlemania XXVIII)

 

The last of The Undertaker and Triple H's 3 'Mania, arguably the best, but easily the most memorable. More tension added with the addition of Shawn Michaels as the Special Guest Referee(seriously, him as ref is almost guaranteed to improve the match),

. While WM28's main event was a solid fight, nothing could top a Hell in a Cell match between the two Superstars that helped the match become a must watch.

The Streak could've ended right then and there, and hardly anyone would've had any complaints.

I used to have an entire roster of Mary/Villain Sues.

Then again, I was only about 11 or so back then.

In the words of Coldplay, "'Now the old King is dead! Long live the King!'"

I think this video is relevant, I'm sorry that the logos in the way

 

The match should've really been called "The Audience & 'Stone Cold' Steve Austin Vs. Goldberg & Brock Lesnar -- OVER-9,000!!!-On-2 Handicap Match."