Commander Urdnot

No. Everybody out there knows something that I do not. Besides, intelligence has many different shapes and forms. As crazy, and idealistic as it sounds, I truly believe that everyone is intelligent in their own way. To walk around thinking/saying that I'm more intelligent than everybody else is just foolish.

I look for Pinkazoidness. Because she is everything I could ever want and more. Smart, funny, kind, beautiful, creative, funny, fun, happy, accepting, patient, those things are all the very definition of Pinkazoidness.

Gustaf Sobin IS Shooga Prum.

0mg guise plz halp ay tink ay brok da sight ;~;

Step 1: Right Click Step 2: Inspect Element Step 3: ??? Step 4: Profit!

Photoshopped.

*coughs*

Me and <3~

Test said I was Choleric, however after analyzing the 4 temperaments, and comparing them with my own personality, I disagree with my result. I think I'm Sanguine. As you can see, while I do identify with all the types, I have FAR more things in common, and less things not in common with Sanguine than I do with any other temperament. Therefore, I am Sanguine.

I'm an "i-don't-care-ual." I don't have to label my sexuality. I don't see why so many people are so eager to label things like sexuality. If you like someone, then you like them. Who cares what it's called? Who cares if it's a male or female? Who cares whether you're a bisexual or a homosexual or a heterosexual? Why do people want to label these feelings so badly? I just never understood that. I have no desire to label those feelings. If I'm attracted to someone, I'm attracted to THEM, not all females in general, and not all males in general. I'm attracted to individual people, not genders as a whole. I'm only attracted to people I have intimate, romantic feelings for. I've never really been the kind of person to just look at someone and be attracted to them, female or male. I'm only attracted to people if I've intimately bonded with them. That's just how I am. I never really had a strong sex drive.

This guy makes a more compelling argument:

Wow, you love me so much, you'd take me out of my comfortable life in the suburbs? Where I have Air Conditioning, a bed, food, electricity, and running water, and put me into an uncharted, deserted island with no food, shelter, electricity, or any contact with civilization? I feel so loved. :w @Thread: I wouldn't take anyone with me, because I don't want anyone I like to end up on a deserted island with no electricity, running water, or any connection with civilization.

I'd be Optimus Prime. Over 70000 pony power v-8 thousand engine, 200 miles to the gallon, 4 cup holders, 5 star safety rating, transforms into 500 foot tall robot. Autobot approved. Act now for 0% APR financing!

+=

My weaknesses? Why do you want to know that? Are you trying to undermine me? Are you thinking about assassinating me? Good luck, friend. I got ADT installed at my house, nothing can hurt me! My house is a heavily-fortified fortress. No one enters... No one leaves, Except me. In all seriousness though, The people I love are both my strength and weakness. They are always there with me during both the good times, and the bad times, and I'm always there with them too. We are always there for each other. Laughing or crying. Smiling or frowning. Easy or difficult. Having fun or talking about our problems. We are always there with eachother, and we always tackle everything that comes our way... Together. Their strengths are mine, and mine are theirs. My weaknesses are theirs, and theirs are mine too. We do everything together as a team. It's not easy for me to bond with someone. I've always been an independent, skeptical person who prefers doing their own thing. I've always preferred doing things alone. I find it very difficult to put even a modicum of trust or faith into anyone or anything. Besides the people that I love. While I do have my doubts at times, I know deep down that I can trust them, because I love them, and I know that they love me too. Bonding with me takes an immense amount of time, patience, and heart. The process is much like the turning coal into diamond. You start out with just a chunk of coal. A cold, dark piece of coal. But if you pick it up, and give it an immense amount of warmth, work, time, effort, and love, it becomes a diamond. One of the most durable, beautiful, and precious things in the world. Once I bond with someone, once that... Connection is formed between us, I end up doing more than just loving them, and being there with them... I end up depending on them, I end up needing them to get by. I'd do anything for the people that I love, and they would do anything for me too. Because we're a team. And it's nice to know that there are people that actually care about me, and it's nice to know that I can be somebody that actually cares about them too. To be able to give them the same sense of comfort and warmth as they give me. Just the thought of them getting hurt, just the thought of something bad happening to them tears me up. When the people I love get hurt, I always feel bad. If something devastating, or especially bad ever happened to them, if they ever got hurt, or worse... I'd be devastated, it would destroy me. If somebody that I loved did something to intentionally hurt me, or if they ended up betraying me, that would destroy me too. I bond so closely with the people that I love. The idea of someone I loved doing that to me... Is devastating. If it happened, it would destroy me. There you have it, my strength and my weakness... Love.

:0 Sweet! A Myers Briggs thread. I love psychology, especially when it involves personality, so I've spent countless hours studying Myers Briggs, Enneagram of Personality, Socionics, and the like. I think personality is fascinating, and consequently, I find the great many theories out there surrounding personality to be fascinating as well. However I must express just how much I detest these personality tests, and personality descriptions that were written by Frosty the Snowman and his army of unpaid interns that have never once come into contact with human beings. Or evidently, any information that truly goes in-depth about Myers Briggs. As anyone who has a basic understanding of Myers Briggs would know that this test, and the descriptions of the personality types you find online are usually superficial, and don't so in-depth at all. Showing how little they actually know about Myers Briggs, the cognitive functions, the personality type they are trying to describe. It's like watching Miss South Carolina try to talk about politics. It's laughable. I'm sure most people are aware that the tests and descriptions are crap, and are just doing this for fun, but it frustrates me because I often do see people struggle with themselves because of these stupid tests. Especially introverted sensors and introverted feelers. I don't like this test in particular because the questions aren't really that good. It often repeats them, I usually end up wishing there a 3rd option that said "Depends," instead of the black-and-white A or B answers that you are provided. The questions themselves aren't even that relevant to the type. Not only that, but the test is too short, and it's very popular, so a lot of people are subjected to it. Anyways, here's what the test thinks I am: INTP Introvert(22%) iNtuitive(75%) Thinking(1%) Perceiving(67)% You have slight preference of Introversion over Extraversion (22%) You have distinctive preference of Intuition over Sensing (75%) You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling (1%) You have distinctive preference of Perceiving over Judging (67%) I agree with some portions of my result, and I also disagree with about as much. I'm definitely not an INTP, I'm an ENTP. While I'm not the most sociable person in the world, I am upbeat, loud, and outspoken, and I am also stimulated by things and events that are in the outside world. Introverts are stimulated by what's in their head, Extroverts are stimulated by things in the outside world. It's about events and activity, not necessarily about people and socializing, that's people often have problems understanding introversion/extroversion. The test failed to take that into account, because it has a poor understanding of how Myers Briggs actually works, that's why it labeled me as introverted. (Also, extroverts can be overwhelmed by events and activity in the outside world. Just because you're stimulated by something doesn't mean you can't be overwhelmed by it.) I agree when it says that I'm 75% iNtuitive. I've always been a bigger-picture kind of guy who cares more about the general idea rather than all of those pointless, meaningless details. This is why I hate school so much, I have that iNtuition pounding in my head asking, "What's the freaken point of all this?" It also explains why I like learning with pictures and charts more than I do with auditory, and hands-on learning. I also tend to be pretty darn abstract. Even I lose myself at times. I detest routine, feel disconnected from the outside world, favor innovation, and always ask "Why?" All very iNtuitive things to do. Plus 75% is a nice looking number too. As for the thinking/feeling, I actually agree with it. Because feelers aren't always nice, and thinkers aren't always blunt. Feeling is more about values, individuality, and empathy than it is about being nice to people. You can be a feeling type, and be a total ass, and you can be a thinking type and be the nicest person on the planet. The key difference here is perspective. A feeler is nice because they are very empathetic. They use their feeling to feel how the other person would feel, and they make their decisions based off of that. A healthy, developed feeling personality-type wouldn't cheat on their significant other, because that would go against their internal values, and they would use their empathy skills to put themselves in the other person's shoes. A healthy, developed thinking personality-type relies on logic. They wouldn't cheat because they would look at it logically, it's be much easier to just talk to their significant other about it, and try to fix the problem, or they could just end the relationship they're in now, and go peruse this other person. If they get caught it just makes things harder for everyone, so logically, they wouldn't do it. I agree with this result because I both use values and empathy and logic when making decisions. Lastly, we have perceiving. While I am a perceiving-personality type, I'm surprised I only got a 67%. I'm extremely groundless, open-minded, lazy, and laid-back. I thought for sure I'd have an 80%+ or a 75% at the very least. Oh, and Apple Bloom is not an ENTP; Discord is an ENTP. I don't know what Apple Bloom is. but she's not ENTP. Shoot me a PM if you're interested in your type, and about this stuff, I love talking to people about it. :w

My passion is the day I finally build my time machine, and return to year 3457 AD to take revenge on the underground society that augmented my minions with cybernetic implants that took control of their minds, and forced them to usurp my throne and send me back to the year 1994. My revenge is a lightning strike. It strikes my enemy directly, and creates a flame. A flame that consumes everything that surrounds. Flee... Flee my enemies, as you watch everything you hold dear burn to ash in a glorious, cleansing flame fueled by the malice of an angry king. Soon I shall pursue last every one of them, relentlessly picking them off one by one until there is nobody left who dares challenge my power. I mean-Ponies. Ponies are my passion. (You'll buy that right? ...Right?)

Glad I jumped ships and bought a gaming laptop instead of saving my cash for a new console, because honestly both the PS4 and the Xbox One look like crap. Digital games tied to accounts? Can't play Xbox and Xbox 360 games? So you're telling me all the games that I have on discs are worthless now? Who thought this was a good idea? Don't most people trade in their old consoles to get money off of the new one? That's what I always did. Well if you do that all those games on discs are worthless now. Remember the PSP Go, Microsoft? Remember how that worked out? It can't even play Xbox 360 and Xbox games? Why? That's so dumb. I thought this was the new high-tech Xbox 1, and you're telling it can't even play games from 2006? That doesn't sound very hi-tech to me. Oh, but it can be used as a TV remote? Can't the Kinect already do that? Oh, but it can run background apps. You mean like my iPhone? I hate my iPhone, and I hate this Xbox 1 piece of crap too. And you know what? I can forgive all of that. All of it. If they just had a nice series of launch titles. I don't care about the console, I care about the games on it. I bought a 3DS, it's not a hardcore console, and I'm not much of a fan of 3D, but it had good games, so I bought it. I don't care if it's not meant for hardcore gamers. I don't care that it's 3D (The 3D's actually pretty good, I'm impressed with it) I care about the games it has. And it has a lot. I can name 13 off of the top of my head on the 3DS. How many can I name for Xbox 1? ZERO. And don't give me any of that bullshit about "Oh, they're gonna announce them at E3" why release the console NOW if they were planning on doing that? Why not just unveil it at E3? This whole presentation was terrible, and it is unacceptable. It's been proven time and time again that the more launch titles you have with your console, the better it sells. THEY DIDN'T EVEN TRY.

>Checklist poll, checks all options by default