Plonkett 345 November 22, 2016 Share November 22, 2016 Since there's more than likely going to be a balanced amount of funny, cute, sad, heartwarming, and dark moments. Do you think there could also be a saucy moment in the film? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyoshi Frost Wolf 41,597 November 22, 2016 Share November 22, 2016 Hmmmm.....Define 'saucy'. If it is what I am thinking then...I have my doubts of that happening. XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RealityPublishing 323 November 22, 2016 Share November 22, 2016 Hmm. . . saucy? I can imagine Twilight's bedroom eyes from time to time, though I'm not sure if that's "saucy" enough. Either way, I'm sure you'll hear me in the back of the theater saying, 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pnylvr 185 November 22, 2016 Share November 22, 2016 Maybe, assuming it was kept to an innuendo level. It's not like the show has entirely stayed away from suggestiveness: 13 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plonkett 345 November 22, 2016 Author Share November 22, 2016 Hmmmm.....Define 'saucy'. If it is what I am thinking then...I have my doubts of that happening. XD Like pnylvr said, having innuendo/suggestiveness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snow 7,050 November 22, 2016 Share November 22, 2016 Do you even target audience you wishfully thinking fiend?! Of course not bro :/ there would not be a suggestive/saucy moment in the my little pony 2017 film.. 2 beans Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ganondorf8 11,318 November 22, 2016 Share November 22, 2016 I don't think they would include something like that given the movie's target demographic. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Piranha 29,428 November 22, 2016 Share November 22, 2016 Like pnylvr said, having innuendo/suggestiveness. I wouldn't doubt it. Not like it's hard to find suggestive jokes and content in practically any animated movie, plus 'em horses aren't strangers of 'em anyway . Like the jelly stallion, or the evil is sexy content ever present in EG series 1 Sig by Discords Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmarston1 5,959 November 22, 2016 Share November 22, 2016 This is My Little Pony movie, so the answer is obviously no. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ziggy + Angel + Rain 11,302 November 22, 2016 Share November 22, 2016 (edited) This is My Little Pony movie, so the answer is obviously no. Maybe, assuming it was kept to an innuendo level. It's not like the show has entirely stayed away from suggestiveness: I just wanted to bring the two of you together; I don't feel I really need to say anything else. Edited November 22, 2016 by Ziggy + Angel + Rain 3 "It uses the faculty of what you call imagination. But that does not mean making things up. It is a form of seeing." - from "The Amber Spyglass" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest November 22, 2016 Share November 22, 2016 It'd be pretty neat if nothing intentionally saucy appeared in the movie or in the show itself, as it's so much better with its innocent charm and all. All I'm expecting is a cute movie about cute ponies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheAnimatorOfficial 567 November 22, 2016 Share November 22, 2016 It'd be pretty neat if nothing intentionally saucy appeared in the movie or in the show itself, as it's so much better with its innocent charm and all. All I'm expecting is a cute movie about cute ponies. Judging by the summary that's not going to be the movie. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alphys Hedge 671 November 22, 2016 Share November 22, 2016 I'm not sure they would ever eat pasta in the movie. mmmmMMMMMmmmm, FUNNYYYY JOKE In all seriousness, they would probably do some innuendo, it's been done before, like @@pnylvr said. 1 Character in profile picture is Pearl from Steven Universe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AaronMk 280 November 22, 2016 Share November 22, 2016 Implying we haven't had saucy moments before? What have you been watching? 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KatonRyu 1,033 December 16, 2016 Share December 16, 2016 Depending on what you'd call 'saucy', my answer is either 'probably' or 'no way in hell'. If it's really just innuendo at the lowest level then yeah, I think we'll see a bit of it, but it's still going to be extremely tame considering the target demographic. There's certainly not going to be anything in it I'd call saucy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver Letter 1,832 December 16, 2016 Share December 16, 2016 What have you been watching? That's funny but also reaching. None of the above counts. 1 Silver Letter!!! Silver Letter's MLP collection Have: 946 https://data.mlpmerch.com/checklist/180/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unikitty 1,212 December 16, 2016 Share December 16, 2016 All this reaching. No, there won't be any sort of saucy business in the movie. The movie is an extension of the show. Wouldn't want it anyway. Sauciness doesn't fit into the shows theme, and inserting it would just be off-putting. All these horny kids wanting adult themes in a children's cartoon are why the fandom get such a bad rap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheAnimatorOfficial 567 December 16, 2016 Share December 16, 2016 All this reaching. No, there won't be any sort of saucy business in the movie. The movie is an extension of the show. Wouldn't want it anyway. Sauciness doesn't fit into the shows theme, and inserting it would just be off-putting. All these horny kids wanting adult themes in a children's cartoon are why the fandom get such a bad rap. Actually it's not an extension but rather a relatively separate entity 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unikitty 1,212 December 16, 2016 Share December 16, 2016 Actually it's not an extension but rather a relatively separate entity Thematically. It's still MLPFiM in design, and thus would adhere to that style. It's not a retelling of the franchise, like the Transformers movies are. So it is an extension of the series in this regard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheAnimatorOfficial 567 December 16, 2016 Share December 16, 2016 Thematically. It's still MLPFiM in design, and thus would adhere to that style. It's not a retelling of the franchise, like the Transformers movies are. So it is an extension of the series in this regard. Actually no it's not directly related to FIM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unikitty 1,212 December 16, 2016 Share December 16, 2016 Actually no it's not directly related to FIM. You misunderstand. The movie is going to be done in the same style as the TV show. It'll look the same, visually. It has Meghan McCarthy doing the screenplay, so it will have the same writing style. It will look and feel and sound like MLPFiM. The only difference is that it will be feature length. You are not going to see themes that you would consider out of place for MLPFiM. It is theMLP movie. It's basically exactly the same as the Pokemon movie franchise. Plotwise, they're not connected to the anime directly. But thematically, they appear in all ways to be a part of the Pokemon series franchise. This is what I mean by 'thematically'. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheAnimatorOfficial 567 December 16, 2016 Share December 16, 2016 (edited) You misunderstand. The movie is going to be done in the same style as the TV show. It'll look the same, visually. It has Meghan McCarthy doing the screenplay, so it will have the same writing style. It will look and feel and sound like MLPFiM. The only difference is that it will be feature length. You are not going to see themes that you would consider out of place for MLPFiM. It is theMLP movie. It's basically exactly the same as the Pokemon movie franchise. Plotwise, they're not connected to the anime directly. But thematically, they appear in all ways to be a part of the Pokemon series franchise. This is what I mean by 'thematically'. As a matter of fact you're mostly wrong. Both the animation and writing style will change quite a bit with updated character designs and a completely different medium of animation. The writing is also from Rita Hsiao (screenwriter of Mulan and Toy Story 2). The background music is done live this time instead of computerized. So no, it's not going to be the same exact style as the show, nor should it be. Edited December 16, 2016 by TheAnimatorOfficial Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unikitty 1,212 December 17, 2016 Share December 17, 2016 As a matter of fact you're mostly wrong. Both the animation and writing style will change quite a bit with updated character designs and a completely different medium of animation. The writing is also from Rita Hsiao (screenwriter of Mulan and Toy Story 2). The background music is done live this time instead of computerized. So no, it's not going to be the same exact style as the show, nor should it be. You're still misunderstood, and at this point I'm starting to think it's a lost cause. You're looking at tiny little differences as proof of the overall movie being completely unlike the show. Yes, the music and animation will be much higher budget. But this is only because they now have the freedom to do so, which was harder on the TV show. This is pretty common in animation. The music is still headed by Daniel Ingram, and will still feel like MLPFiM, only more grandiose. The animation is in the same boat. Ultimately, it'll still be clearly MLPFiM in design traits. This time they're just able to use a better medium, and put more time into it, so that we get an overall smoother and prettier animation and visual design. But it's going to still share most visual traits with the franchise. In fact, for product recognition, it's really important that they do keep the similarities and feeling. The screenwriting is still being done by Meghan McCarthy, with Rita Hsaio as a co-writer(most likely for their experience in working with feature length films). The animation's director is exactly the same person. He recently even stepped down as director of the show, to work full-time on the movie. So, again. Thematically, the show is still going to be MLPFiM at heart. It will look prettier and sound prettier, but it will still feel like MLPFiM. All of these little differences don't mean that we're going to see radical changes in the franchise's formula and design. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
\/ 651 December 17, 2016 Share December 17, 2016 mmmmMMMMMmmmm, FUNNYYYY JOKE I get that reference. Obi Wan Canoli. Enter the Forest... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trademark2 485 December 17, 2016 Share December 17, 2016 (edited) I think this would be a great idea! ^.^ It's not neccessarily out of place thematically either, unikitty. Obviously they aren't going to be clopping in the show, but they could have some romantic feelings shown in it, with a saucy moment, nothing wrong with that. In fact, it would probably go over well with young girls. I'm not sure about the term saucy though, I don't know exactly what it means. I assume it means somewhat risqué lines along with the post earlier showing previous 'saucy' stuff Edited December 17, 2016 by trademark2 2 Feel free to message or add me everypony! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Join the herd!Sign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now