Jump to content
Banner by ~ Kyoshi Frost Wolf

Cloud Strife

User
  • Posts

    536
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Cloud Strife

  1. I personally believe that they're able to handle death as a subject, beyond simple references that it can happen. However, the way that they should tackle it is indeed very delicately. I've lost someone in my family before that I hardly knew, and yet when I attended the memorial service, the grief was palpable. I could feel it in everyone who attended, and I'm not the type of person all that sensitive to how other people feel. As of right now, the show has hinted at the loss of Applejack's parents. It's definitely a canon part of the show (it's been referenced even by the staff of the show), but I don't know how they would be able to depict it without making a rather depressing episode with nothing uplifting within it. This show is supposed to be optimistic and there's nothing optimistic that you can spin on death beyond the not-really-comforting "at least they're in a better place now". I'm sure they want to do it, they just don't know how yet.
  2. I hope I cause no offense with this, but I don't really like your definition of what a "good person" is. It's so limiting, and there's so few people who fit under that definition that it'd be impossible to expect yourself to. There are some ideals of it that I agree with. A "good person" should be one who is open to learning, and willing to correct their behavior if it's problematic. A "good person" should be one who ultimately has the best intentions at heart. But... There is nobody on this earth who is infallible. There's also never a time when someone is always confident in all areas, nobody who is constantly humble, nobody who is constantly self reliant, nobody who doesn't need praise or reassurance every once in a while. Let me hazard a guess - Applejack is your favorite character, isn't she? What if I told you that she wouldn't be anywhere without her family and her friends? Sure, she is pretty self reliant, but how do you think she got that way? Even then, some of that self reliance resulted in stubbornness, that led to her trying to reject Twilight's advances to help, only for her to inevitably realize that she does actually need it. She's made mistakes that have gotten her friends in trouble, and she has ultimately come out a better person for it. Let me try a different approach here. Every single one of us is a WIP. That's because it's impossible for us to be perfect, and we should always be striving to be the best that we can currently be. There are some issues I have that I'm going to have to be dealing with my entire life. You'll be the same. But would I argue that either of us is less of a "good person" for it? Would I dare to suggest that, because we want attention, because we want to be loved, because we sometimes have times when we need help, that that means that we aren't ultimately good? We will always have places that we're weak in. That's what makes all of us human; that's what makes the Mane Six relatable, because they have the same kinds of struggles. You're your harshest critic. Think of it this way: if your friends didn't meet those standards that you set on what a "good person" is, would you think of them as...well, not good? No, right? So why do you think of yourself that way?
  3. There's no contest: I was most excited about Rosalina being a newcomer in there. I'm also pretty partial to Bowser Jr. as I used to write him, but Rosalina is by far my favorite female Mario character and I'm really glad that they included her and other female characters within Sm4sh. The more girls the better, I'd say.
  4. Actually, funnily enough, it's canon that Rainbow Dash has a feminine side. She likes the dress that she's been given by Rarity, and she has, more than once, shown interest in typically feminine activities. It's sappiness (which, to be fair, is a feminine-associated trait) that she seems to shy away from, but even then that was more early seasons and back then, it'd more been along the lines of "THIS IS JUST LIQUID PRIDE. I JUST HAVE SOMETHING IN MY EYE." Lately, she's taken to being pretty openly affectionate.
  5. I'd actually argue that that's something that's worth questioning. While it's a perfectly valid reason, why do people dislike people who take pride in their accomplishments and brag about it? Why are we so down on braggarts, logically? For some you could argue it's because they put others down in their bragging, but funnily enough, Rainbow Dash doesn't do that much at all (in fact, quite the opposite). People loving themselves is a good thing, and it's just as annoying, to me, when someone goes out of their way to put themselves down, whether they're doing it for sympathy or not. Feeling good about yourself is not a crime. I'd say it's something we should actually strive for.
  6. Finally. I swear, crickets were chirpin' in here! Also, I'd be glad to make friends with anypony! Though, y'know, maybe it might be better for you to go to Twilight about that... She's the princess of friendship, after all!
  7. Are any of the staff members active in other fandoms aside from this one? Just curious~
  8. Hey, everypony, how's it goin'? It's your friendly neighborhood Rainbow Dash here! Y'know, I normally have a really busy schedule, but I thought I'd take some time out of it to answer some questions - just for kicks, at least! Before we start, though, I'd like to lay a few ground rules: Try to keep your questions nice-like. I don't talk to jerks. (Just ask Gilda.) I might not go in depth for some more...uh, what's the word...invasive questions, I guess. Like, y'can ask 'em, but don't get mad if I don't feel like talkin' about it. Try not to repeat yourselves. I only got so much time in the day! I'm a very busy pony, so it would help me out a lot if you read all of the posts in the thread before asking a question, yeah? Follow up questions are totally chill with me, just make sure you make it clear what question you're following up. There's some posers out here, but y'know what? I'm flattered that they're tryin' to make impressions out of me - so, like, don't go around and put 'em down in my name, okay? 'Long as they don't try to steal my spotlight, I don't mind havin' 'em around. Y'clear on all that? Good! Now get askin'! (Note: I may draw out some answers if I have the time and feel like doing so. I won't do this for every answer.)
  9. I'd prefer it if she didn't fly. Ultimately, this is a show to appeal to children, and even though it would make her "happy" to have her fly, it would certainly send the wrong message to people who have disabilities watching the show. In fact, the one thing that I disliked from Flight to the Finish was the ambiguity of the condition of her wings. Scootaloo implies it's because her wings haven't grown in, but I would like more than just an implication. It really is whatever the execs decide, but I feel like it's a cop-out at this point to allow her that ability.
  10. I understand it. Rainbow Dash is a character that would definitely be the most divisive of the Mane Six, with Applejack being the least. Applejack's character in comparison to Rainbow's is more subtle; and the more subtle a character is, the less likely people will feel extremely for that character either which way (hence the joke that Applejack is a "background pony"). Rainbow's character is much more in your face, so that either makes or breaks her for people. Unfortunately, fandoms also have a habit of reducing characters to one-dimensional archetypes - and while those characters do fit those archetypes, there's more to them than just the archetype. There are people who like her despite knowing that she has good traits, but there are also people who dislike a caricature of her that they believe to be her, rather than the character herself. I think it's a reflection of how we characterize people in real life. Some people will look at someone who comes off a bit brash and give them the benefit of the doubt, think they are just that way because they're into sports and they have a soft side to them; while others will look at them and instantly think "wow that person is a big jerk I don't ever want to get to know them". In reality, everyone (and therefore, if a writer is good, everypony) cannot be reduced to a single phrase. Heck, I can't tell you how many people who will assume that Rainbow just hates everything feminine and will write her like that despite evidence in canon to the contrary (the episode with the Parasprites not counting because c'mon, that hat really did look freaking ridiculous). That's because it's extremely rare for there to be a real person out there who rejects all aspects of masculinity, or all aspects of femininity, and having Rainbow like some but not others is how real people like her function. This fandom also tends to attract people who aren't the types to look beyond surface-level, too. That's not a bad thing, mind you. Trusting your gut and your first impression can come in handy in certain situations, because there are some people who are just as awful as you think they are. Being too trusting is just as much something that would put someone at a disadvantage as being distrustful of everyone. Many people in this fandom come here as a safe haven because out in the real world, they're being bullied by people who may come off similarly to Rainbow, and it makes it difficult for them to make that distinction. It's likely why another commenter in this thread said that Rainbow's only a "tweak" away from being like Diamond Tiara and Silverspoon, despite that being blatantly false; she does share a lot of characteristics with people like that, but the main difference being, funnily enough, her element. I'd go on about how people in this fandom also like to reduce characters to their elements instead of, y'know, being actual characters (thereby going into debates about whether or not Applejack/Rainbow should have their elements switched) but that's a tangent for another discussion. Regardless, it counts as an example of why there are so many misconceptions about characters like her: they're looked at a highly personal and incorrect angle, instead of as literary characters with depth that the writers (for the most part) know what they're doing with. That being said, as some other commenters have pointed out, some of them just can't stand her faults even despite acknowledging that she has genuinely good traits as well and that's fine. My intention is not to make people like Rainbow Dash who can't possibly do so, but rather to clear up any misconception about her based on personal experiences that actually don't apply to her.
  11. I think Scootaloo having an actual sister would defeat the purpose of Rainbow Dash being a surrogate. The point in Rainbow Dash being a Cool Big Sis to Scootaloo is to express the idea that you don't have to be related by blood to be sisters. The two of them function well enough in a sibling relationship together, therefore they are siblings and no one would offer any sort of replacement for her.
  12. I think how dark it is right now fits perfectly with the tone that it's supposed to be. After all, this is a show for kids - wouldn't want to make it too dark. I think that the more dark stuff that would appeal to an older audience should stay within fanworks.
  13. I haven't played Dynasty Warriors, so I couldn't say. All I'm saying is that it renders the claim that every Zelda game is the same inaccurate. My point was not about whether or not the choices they made were good. My point was that they do make different choices. That being said, while people do complain about the linearity of Skyward Sword, I don't see many people who outright dislike this game or count it as a deal breaker. The claim that making every Zelda game like A Link to the Past would help the franchise goes against the diversity argument that you were trying to make earlier. In fact, it's the copying of the formula that's made a lot of franchises that Nintendo has, such as Mario, devolve from where they were going before. If you haven't noticed lately, a lot of games have been playing at this "nostalgia" view and we get a lot of more of the same games that way. The Mario series isn't the only one plagued with these decisions, either. The Sonic series has started to go down this route (except in their case they forgot what made their old games good and fun to play). It's no longer about putting in different ideas these days; it's about appealing to people who want the old formulas back.
  14. I had a more thorough post in mind that involved personal experience, but my computer black screened on me, so I'll try to sum up my original point: Fluttershy is put on a pedestal because characters like her, more feminine and shy, are implied to be weaker and thus in more need of protection. Every person is equally capable of strength, but some are more easily able to tap into that strength than others; however, our society doesn't really teach that lesson. Despite the fact that the emotionally set back are just as capable of abusive, bully-like tendencies as any person who's outgoing and more boisterous (and in fact, more subtle tactics through passive aggressiveness and guilt tripping, which are far more effective in staying with you than a generally rude comment), we give them a free pass because they're shy, or they have enough they're going through as it is. This is the case with Fluttershy, whose actions were defended even by the narrative within Putting Your Hoof Down, despite the fact that with all of Rainbow's callous remarks, they didn't come even remotely close to how terrible Fluttershy was to Rarity and Pinkie Pie by insulting their reasons for living. It's very common for someone in a debate to take the side of the shy, weak, helpless person as opposed to the loud, brash, and outgoing person, regardless of whether or not the latter has a better point. Trust me, I would know - I'm the latter in that kind of situation. Note: This isn't meant to insult Fluttershy as a character. In fact, I like her, and I amount her insults in Putting Your Hoof Down to clumsy writing without thought to the implications. They tried to give a lesson on assertiveness without aggressiveness, but unfortunately implied that what Fluttershy said to her friends is either what she really thought of them, or something she lied about with the intention of hurting them.
  15. A good rule of thumb to note: there are a lot of people out there who feel the same way who are socializing with you. They're thinking about how terrible it would be for other people to think of them like that, feel out of practice with socializing, etc. Sure there are people who are confident but most people are not confident everywhere. The best way to get good at socializing is to practice it - and yes, that would mean painting a target on yourself in certain situations. As for criticism, it depends on the kind of criticism you're receiving. If it's not constructive (i.e. doesn't give you compliments and specify what exactly it is that you need to improve) then it's not worth taking under consideration. If it is, keep in mind most people trying to give you constructive criticism are trying to help you. Taking criticism is as much of an art as giving it, though, and I can totally understand how easy it is to leap to conclusions from what criticism they give you (hell, I still have problems with it). Just remember that there are people out there who don't think you're weird, and in fact fear that they're weird to you.
  16. I believe the reason for that is because everyone has problems, everyone needs attention, and everyone wants a good life - but some people are more outspoken about these needs than others, whether because of pride, because they've been told their situation is fine as it is, or because they feel they don't have it "as bad" as other people. It's not bad at all to want to deal with something yourself, but there will be situations in which you simply can't and it's best to confide in someone. Fandoms tend to unite people because, unfortunately, no matter what you like, no matter where you come from, and no matter who you are, there's always a naysayer walking around out there. Fandoms also can attract people who do terrible things, too; basically, what some outsiders think this fandom is comprised of. And of course, these people stand out because the pony fandom is so large by comparison of other fandoms that slip better underneath the radar. The main point of it is that there are many people under different walks of life who will watch, play, and just generally like the same thing, but a part of the human condition because of the world we live in results in us suffering from pain, and some are better at dealing with it than others. Perhaps people come across as more "broken" within a fandom because online, people see a safe space to share their thoughts and feelings that they might not see when they're face-to-face, but for all you know the people you're talking to on these forums are people you've passed by on the streets, in supermarkets, or even fellow students within your school.
  17. Dating. I have a girlfriend, but she's not really into MLP, hah.
  18. I believe you should use discretion with whose opinions you care about. If you don't care at all, you could let yourself become carried away and treat people in ways they shouldn't be treated, and in that sense you should definitely take constructive criticism under consideration. If you get too caught up in what other people think, though, it'll lead you to developing anxiety about what you do. Thinking carefully behind what you say is not a bad thing, but you shouldn't feel afraid to speak at all. If you do, then you care too much. Much like anything else in life, it's a balance.
  19. This post absolutely reeks of "look at me, I'm superior because I don't quit something I like at a certain point". Dude, you're watching a show with pastel colored horses, calm down. People are allowed to have standards. If they don't want to watch a show, they don't want to watch a show and you are in no position to judge. As for me, I think the only thing that would really make me quit (that I could think of right now) is them going against the feminist angle that the show is supposed to take. They have had some pretty bad morals and episodes that have their morals muddied up, but they haven't done anything to imply that any girl is lesser than another yet. I have faith in them enough that the episodes with bad morals are simply duds.
  20. Here are shows I have watched besides MLP (recently as there are many old cartoons but I barely remember them): - Gravity Falls - Danny Phantom - Sonic X - My Cat from Hell - Steven Universe (although I don't like it much) And that's about all I can remember. I don't watch television very often.
  21. I have two real blogging blogs that aren't RP blogs. I won't link the first because it's unrelated to ponies (and lately it's been bogged down by people insisting certain asexuals don't exist...), but here's my pony one. It's very easy to see what my ship is from that, whoops.
  22. You know, there are a lot of problems with EQG, but I can't for the life of me understand those complaining about Twilight being too "stupid" and about Spike being "smarter". Spike has always walked on two legs and used his hands to open doors; Twilight has never in her entire life done so. There are so many other problems with it (such as a Deus Ex Machina that doesn't make sense) that you really don't need to be nitpicking like that in order to get across that EQG is intrinsically flawed.
  23. Why can't you? Do you have any logical reason why you can't get along with someone based on a mutual bond with someone else? That's how I met and got to know a lot of the friends that I have. Sure, eventually they'll have to branch out, but it's the one thing that they (currently) find that they have in common. They will find more, of course, as they get to know Maud as a character further, but it's a perfectly acceptable catalyst to a friendship. To say that you absolutely cannot start a friendship based on that premise is awfully bleak. Come on, this is a place based on friendship being magic. I'm sure you could come up with something.
  24. I'm guessing you haven't played Hyrule Warriors. (Also, Skyward Sword is pretty drastically different from the others, what with how linear it is by comparison. Plus, stamina.)
  25. Pirating is still illegal, though...? Regardless of it's a small or large thing, Nintendo can still get in trouble for it. It may be the difference between breaking someone's arm and breaking both of their legs, but you're still breaking a bone here. Also, you're reading a tone I never placed into my post by saying that I'm apparently saying that there are millions of people trying to use the Wii U to hack into...Pentagon, whatever that is. I was merely explaining why that would be in place. I didn't try to come off as, and it shouldn't have read as, me implying that people are trying to do something illegal on the Wii U. Also, as I said in my post, it's a "glorified brick" because the terms that you're agreeing to are about the OS, on which the whole Wii U runs. If you aren't agreeing to the OS's terms then you shouldn't be so surprised that the Wii U doesn't function. You haven't adequately explained why it's not right for them to update their license agreement after you've obtained the product when many products do the same. You've protested that it bricks the entire Wii U and that they shouldn't have "made" you agree to something after you already paid for the product, but that's implying that they forced you to pay for the product in the first place. You chose that you wanted this system, and they're trying to tell you what you're allowed to do with it, unless you want your contract with them broken. If you feel that any specific terms that they're trying to get you to agree to are "unfair", then you can either take it up with them, or just not buy the product. I simply don't understand the fuss of them wanting to get you to agree even if it means blocking access to their console. You did pay for it but it's ultimately their console that they worked to create and make for you to be able to consume.
×
×
  • Create New...