Nyactis Mewcis Catlum

634

Adorable/10. Twilight, pls.

Hi. I'm a woman. I have told you numerous times why you're having trouble, in multiple threads. I was being fair in those responses and tried to be at-level with you. You haven't responded any of those times. Since it doesn't seem to be getting across to you, I'm going to be very blunt in this response. Women want the alpha guys because they're the ones who treat them with genuine respect. They're the ones who are outright about their feelings toward these women. Women are averse to you because it's very, very clear you resent them, and every post you make oozes with this resentment. You don't believe a word you're saying when you wax sentiment about protecting women and wanting to respect them. You say that, but your actions don't back it up. You're going through the motions because, like most people, you crave social intimacy and you think that's the way you're going to earn it. When these actions aren't met supportively, your response to it is, "What the heck? Why don't these women like me? I'm doing exactly what they want! I'm doing what they say I should do! Ugh, women are so hard to understand..." But here's the thing: you shouldn't be doing things to be a good person just to get that attention. You should be doing good things because they're the right thing to do. You're not winning women over because, quite frankly, you're transparent. And women are generally self-respecting enough not to date someone who's going to resent them or prejudge them based on their gender. Are there women out there who go for people who treat them badly? Sure. Are there women who pass up opportunities that would benefit them to their detriment? I could say so. But it's not, like, a system, man. It's not like these women are systematically against you, trying to beat you to the ground. And even if they were: why do you want to impress them in the first place? Why do you want women who won't respect you? Surely you want a partner who's going to love you for who you are, and not for an act you put on simply to make them like you? Here's my word of advice: you NEED to let that resentment for women that you have go. And don't tell me you don't have it. Actions speak louder than words. Once you start seeing women as individuals rather than a collective playing to a system, you'll find you'll have much better luck with them. Also, be genuine, to yourself and to other people - don't say things that you don't believe in and don't agree with. People can see through it, and there is literally no one on this earth who likes a phony, so if you want to be liked, be honest. And really think about why people believe the things that you're saying instead of just parroting it. Why do people believe that? Do you think it's actually legitimate? If so, why? If not, why not? Give it some serious thought, not just one to two minutes. Research into claims you see on the internet. Think about why someone is an authority figure on a subject in the first place. This is your world view we're talking about here. And lastly, have some respect for your fellow man, too. Instead of seeing these alpha men as your opponents, really examine the men with successful relationships and figure out what they have in common. If you emulate that, or at least attempt to understand it, you may find yourself having more success than you currently are treating them as enemies. You don't even know the agonized noise I just made. Add that to my list.

I've drank alcohol once in my life. It was gross.

Stereotypes don't come from nowhere. A lot of stereotypes have a grain of truth to them - how much truth depends on the subject of the stereotype. That being said, no particular group of people should be judged by a stereotype. Every individual is different in some way; some people will exhibit stereotypical traits more than others. It's presumptuous to assume that a group will all act the same, even if that group shares some similarities. It's always safest to judge a person by their individual characteristics, devoid of what you may have heard before. This is true no matter the group, gender, race, etc. It's also why sweeping generalizations of a group are something I discourage, because there will always be exceptions no matter what stereotype you're banking on. I'm very individualistic in the way I treat people. I do my best to treat everyone free of any external biases. I let people's own actions speak for themselves, and make judgments off of that, rather than what I may have heard somewhere else. It is typical for the human mind to attempt to pick up patterns in people's behavior, and sometimes those patterns ring true, and I'll even point out these patterns from time to time, but I do my best not to let these patterns make me prejudge someone before I've come to know them.

You know how the joke goes: it's interesting how "politics" sounds as if it's a combination of "poly", meaning many, and "ticks", meaning blood-sucking creatures. As of the S8 premiere, discussions about ponies have been curbing more toward the political side. I'm not overly surprised by this, as cartoon analytics often tie in the media they consume with the real world - as well they should, as cartoons and other media don't exist within a vacuum. The cautionary tale is not so much in the fact that real world events and politics are being related to the media we consume, but rather that the oversaturation of it is blinding us to what the episodes, and indeed the spirit of the show, are actually primarily about. This would not be the first time that this issue will come up, and it will certainly not be the last, either. I think the problem in this lies in the assumption that events within a cartoon or any other media are actually, 100%, 1-to-1 parallels of these events and they're intended to be. The problem is that making them like this would make the media not age well, as it will comment on events that may eventually blow over as time proceeds onward, which is why I think reducing it to that can be problematic in the sense that it misses the overall message being conveyed. I am, of course, the first person who will tell you that no interpretation is wrong when it comes to media, and it's why I didn't like Fame & Misfortune, because it attempted to spread the idea there's a wrong feeling to garner about it. Rather, I'm attempting to say that authorial intent is rarely these 1-to-1 parallels as no smart writer would do that; it would date the work unless it's outright about it being that particular parallel (such as older works that specifically talk about an issue). I also find another problem is that these comparisons are, well, to be frank, they're not well thought-out, and I think that's because people oversimplify why something is good or bad, rather than actually considering why they feel that way. In other words, they listen to the authority figures that have told them this over their life, but never stopped and considered why those authority figures said that to them. I'm not suggesting that such ideas should not be discussed, but I think some of the prevalence of these discussions can be attributed to not thinking enough into what makes a similarity, a similarity. Just because it reminds you of something, doesn't mean it's actually like that something in practice. And some of you who have thought already into what I'm saying know what I'm talking about, but for those who don't, the examples I provide you are: racism & imperialism, especially in the case of the latter. I don't think, and would never agree with, the idea that the S8 premiere was intended to parallel any particular real world situation. Certainly, it's inspired by real world events, but it's not specifically criticizing anything (except perhaps how the school functions, which arguably parodies real school boards, but even then it's not targeting any specific school board). I also don't think the Cutie Map has any particular implication toward this, either. And I think, given some of the arguments I've seen, people are bringing in their own personal issues with the world into the episode and suggesting that the episode is saying that much. A noteworthy example, though the individual will not be named, is something regarding "white unicorns", despite Chancellor Neighsay never displaying any bias toward a particular faction of pony, nor would any bias toward colors of all things make any sense within the My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic universe. And this is what I mean. As I said, there is no wrong way to interpret a work, but I do think there is a simplified way of viewing it and there's a nuanced way of viewing it, and many people seem to be taking the simplified way without considering nuance. And that is why it's getting so heated and controversial. They're looking at an episode and suggesting it's making a statement that it may not actually be making. You could say it's an unintended side effect of the episode, which I would certainly agree in the case of other episodes, but when examining the actual context, the authorial intent rings clear as day that a political jab is probably not what they were trying to make with the premiere. Even without that, the focus on this particular aspect of the episodes without even seeing the full season, without giving Chancellor Neighsay a chance to get the development he clearly is going to (given that he's coming back), and the discussion seems inundated with the same talking points. I've noticed that a lot of the topics about these premieres are similar. Of course, be the change you want to see, I'm aware, and making more topics of my own would probably aid to remedy the situation, but I figured it was worth making a journal entry discussing it and pointing out that it's a trend I noticed. And evidently, I wasn't the only one to have noticed it, as I've seen other journal entries and status updates of people growing frustrated with it. I'm not frustrated that politics are being related to ponies, and in fact I believe it to be inevitable. But I do think there's a possibility such discussion is not nuanced enough, and it's also not contained enough. Those are just my thoughts, though. Feel free to let me know what you think.

Definitely understandable. While the show does parallel the real world, I think people get a little too carried away in how close the parallel is actually supposed to be. I have noticed the constant insistence of political topics such as imperialism being encouraged in the show, and I just don't get that impression at all, among other arguments that seem to have nothing to do with the episode's contents (I'm still baffled by the whole "white unicorn" thing in one of the threads, like what the heck? where on earth did that come from?). You have my regards.

No problem! I'll be sure to keep an eye out for that. Fair enough! Wait mode is probably the best one to implement if you're going to implement any of them and stick to one. I only recall Active being helpful for me in FFVII when I had to build limit breaks and so let my opponents attack me, and I'm doubtful that limit breaks will actually come into play with this game. (Or will they...?) I would stick to Active just because it's faster when playing FFVII, but Wait mode is far more accessible because then enemies can't attack you during menus, so I'm not surprised you would lean toward that instead. Will it be possible to skip over turns if you have more than one character with a filled, er...whatever term you're going to use once Rest Time is full? That was something I appreciated in FFVII since it allowed more versatility in strategy as opposed to waiting for everyone to go in a set order, so I'd be interested in your thoughts on that. And no problem! I'm looking forward to this!

Let me start with prefacing that your artwork is absolutely gorgeous, and I'm really looking forward to seeing the direction that this project takes. Also I would totally beta test but that's not important. Now, with that being said... I was looking at the sprite work that you had on the over world. Of course, I'm sure right now you're just attempting to get an overall scheme working for it, but once you've got that, if you plan on sticking to these bigger sprites at the bottom, might I suggest making another expression for when the pony is low on HP? I always find small touches like that really nice in games. If it's possible, an idle animation to your main sprites too could work wonders, but I can understand if that part would be too much of a hassle. EDIT: If you want an example of this, Kingdom Hearts has got a nice one. Also, something else - Are you going for a system similar to the ATB system such as that used in earlier Final Fantasy games? Because if so, count me in approval of it. The ATB system is a great system. If you plan on implementing that, though, you might want to implement a Wait mode for it on top of the normal mode, so players can go at different paces. Final Fantasy VII is a good example to go by for ATB, as it's got an Active, Recommended, and Wait mode. Active is everyone goes literally once they get the chance to and you can also skip turns as long as someone is able to act; but this also applies to enemies, so they can attack you while you're not doing anything. Wait makes it so turns go at the player's pace entirely, so enemies can't attack until after the player characters have already gone. I believe Recommended is a mixture of the two. If I'm completely off the mark, though, feel free to let me know.