Jump to content
Banner by ~ Ice Princess Silky

Azatrot

User
  • Posts

    109
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Azatrot

  1. MLP in VR actually already exist, allthough it's not nearly as advanced as what I suspect that you wish it to be: It's called PonyVRville: http://kaitouace.com/vr/ I did try it on a con a few years ago, and it was quite nice.
  2. If you are refering to the leaked episodes: I have seen them, and they are almost 100% certainly real (unless we get really philosophical). The other stuff is also probably real, but that's not as certain. It's much easier to fake emails and some fanart, and it is 4chan we are talking about. Really? I have always thought that we as a fandom were overestimating our importance, but if we make up almost half of their income that would be great news for the fandom! Still, do you have a source for this?
  3. I, umm... I guess you got me there. I will give you that. But what I meant was that while the feelings themselves can drive us to change the universe (usually a rather small part of it), they don't influence the validity of an idea; The Earth doesn't become flatter just because we feel that it should, or because it would hurt our feelings if the idea of a flat Earth wasn't true. Feelings CAN however motivate us to build a giant rolling pin to flatten the Earth with. So in that way the universe care about our feelings. Yes, I agree. We should be completely merciless to ideas, but not to the persons holding the ideas. It would also be logically fallacious to attack the persons rather than the ideas, since as I said: Ideas should stand on their own merits. But that's irrelevant. As I just said: Merits! The events that lead a person to hold a particular idea have no impact on the validity of the idea. The Earth doesn't get flatter just because the flat-earther have a sympathic reason to believe that the Earth is flat. Ideas must stand on their own. Partly agree, partly disagree. It's important to listen to the empirical evidence and logical reasoning that lead the person to believe what they believe. Ideas should be given a fair chance, even outlandish ones. Compassion is of course good. I'm not contesting that. But when analyzing ideas, the purpose isn't to make ones life "go so much better". It's to figure out if the idea have any validity. It's about being honest, even when it's difficult.
  4. Does the same logic apply to whatever created the universe? This argument is just special pleading. String theory doesn't state that the 10th dimension is "characterized by infinite possibilities" (whatever that means). That's just something made up by new agers, in the same way as they pretend that quantum physics support various of their claims when it actually doesn't (like psychic powers). It's called quantum quackery, and actual quantum physicists hate that stuff when new agers twist their ideas to support claims that they actually don't support. Even if we disregard the poor example of Ken Ham, this is a horrible argument. Just because people believe in something doesn't make it right (Newton believed in astrology, for example). The validity of ideas should be judged on their own merits, and nothing else. And while there is nothing that ourright disproves the existence of an unspecific god, there is nothing that points to it either, and per Occams Razor, it should not be a preferred explanation to unexplained phenomena. Einstein didn't believe in any gods. He was a pantheist (and that was what he was referring to when he talked about god), and as Richard Dawkins said: "Pantheism is just sexed up atheism". No. Ideas should not be respected. They should be mercilessly analyzed, torn to pieces and have all their flaws pointed out. Only if an idea can stand up to this brutal scrutiny on it's own merits should it be respected, and even then only until new data becomes available that challenges it again. Anything else would be dishonest. And the feelings of those who hold the ideas are completely irrelevant. The universe doesn't care about feelings, and an idea doesn't become more true just because of "feelings". Only merits matter.
  5. Well... seems fairly accurate. I'm fairly center when it comes to left vs right, but I'm generally against government control (with exceptions of course). I usually describe myself as a "soft libertarian" or classical liberal.
  6. (CAVEAT: Now, I know that the writers are probably not thinking on this level of detail and consistency, but I still think it's fun to speculate about the deeper lore anyway) So it has previously been hinted that Granny Smith is hundreds of years old (she was present during the founding of Ponyville and Twilight says in Winter Wrap Up "Ponyville was started by Earth ponies, so for hundreds of years they've never used magic to clean up winter"). This raises the question of how ponies age and how long they live. As of The Perfect Pear we may have gotten an additional clue for those of us that like to overanalyze the lore of this show: Before the song, Bright Mac tells Pear Butter that it is their 131456 hour anniversary (about 15 years) since he first called her Buttercup. He did this earlier in the episode when they where young. Then they looked like the cake twins, but they spoke very well, so they were probably a bit older (but not as old as the CMC). Maybe the equivalent of 3-5 years? If that is the case, then we learned that ponies becomes young adults at about 18-20 (and also legally able to marry). This seems consistent with how humans age, but it doesn't seem consistent with Granny Smith's age. But maybe ponies mature as fast as humans, but still can live longer? I'm probably missing some previous data. But what implications does this have for pony aging? Could this somehow be used to better guess the age of the main six if combined with earlier known facts? What are your thoughts?
  7. The fandom have fewer members now than what we had a few years ago. However, that doesn't mean that the fandom is dying; It's maturing. Of course there will be a lot of people jumping on the bandwagon when something new gets popular, but most will move on to something new after a while. The more devoted fans will stay longer. That's the natural progression of fandoms. There is nothing wrong with this. There is still a lot of new artwork, fanfiction, music and other fan content being produced. I think the brony fandom will live on a lot longer than the show itself, since the fan content itself will inspire more content to be created (this is most easily seen with fanfiction, where a fic will take inspiration from other fics). And in any case, spamming other sites is more likely to harm the reputation of the fandom than help it.
  8. I'm an agnostic atheist because, as has been said in this thread, it's the null hypothesis. That also means that I am open to changing my view if evidence is presented for the existence of a god, but so far I haven't seen any valid evidence that doesn't violate Occam's Razor.
  9. The main ones are Equestria Daily (multiple times a day), their forum, Fimfiction (I'm currently reading about 20 different fanfics!), this site, Youtube (watching pony videos) and a lot of smaller ones. That's... a lot of pony. I didn't realize it until now that I write it out.
  10. I find this to be a rather interesting spin on the standard "would you go to Equestria" question. Both answers mean that you have to abandon a family, so it's a really difficult question. I would probably choose to stay in Equestria. However not because it is a magical land with talking horses (That would be a bonus, but I find it to be a rather shallow reason to abandon your family). My family on Earth would probably already had found a way to cope with me being gone (even if I'm not dead, but in a coma), so the emotional impact of me abandoning them wouldn't be as severe for them (or me) as if I abandoned my new family.
  11. I liked Angel Wings better. She was really cute, and her awkwardness only added to her cuteness.
  12. I think that there will be at least 8 seasons. The reason being the movie: I don't quite understand the argument that I have seen being made several times that the movie would mark the end of this generation. That wouldn't make any sense, since the movie will probably get more people into the show, and it would be a huge waste not to capitalize on that.
  13. I think that a lot of bronies (myself included) had already predicted most major plot-elements of this episode before it aired... ...In our sweetest dreams! This episode was exactly what I wanted! I can hardly wait for part 2!
  14. It was a long time ago that I watched Twilight's Kingdom, but did Tirek actually display any knowledge of Cadance before storming into the throne room? Still... I suppose if he didn't know about her he would have been surprised when he saw her, so he probably did.
  15. Another universe. The cosmology (and some laws of physics) of the equestrian universe seems to be completely different than ours.
  16. Yay! And I do not quite understand this whole paranoia about the show declining in quality if it goes on for long enough (well... at least not that it needs to be like that by necessity): There is still a lot of potential left with this show, especially if they gradually shift the focus away from the mane 6 and toward secondary characters (and there are a LOT of characters that they could develop further). This would also go over well with the "buy our toys!"-motto. It's a win-win! And I think that it is also highly likely that we will get a season 8: The movie will likely draw in some more audience, so it would be a waste not to.
  17. Starlight Glimmer. She wasn't some big powerful and deliberately malicious monster (although she was deliberately malicious in the finale). She was just a regular (but very talented) unicorn that genuinely thought that what she was doing was for the betterment of Equestria (once again, this only applies to the premiere). And the methods she used were creepily similar to those used by real cults (with some magic thrown in, of course). And while many people complain about her freudian excuse, I actually find it believeable. It was definitely petty, but I don't find it very far fetched that she would be emotionally crushed by losing her best and only friend, On second place is Discord, for obvious reasons.
  18. We already have working autonomous AI surgeons (presumably you need to start them and tell them what to do first, but still autonomous and flexible). There was recently an article about an AI surgeon capable of operating soft tissue (much more difficult than with bone). This was done on pig carcasses first, but they also did some surgery on live pigs. I think it currently took about 40 minutes to perform an operation that would take about 8 minutes for an experienced human surgeon, so there is still some ways to go, however. As for AI in general: We have just in the last few years made huge leaps. Neural networks have already made AI much more human-like in it's way of thinking (image recognition, for example. That's something VERY impressive, even if it's currently imperfect). Neural networks is not a new technology, but it's just recently that we have started to develop them more seriously, and we are already seeing extraordinary results. SpaceX have spoken about it, and are already preparing for it. In just a few years (I think it was 2018) they intend to launch an unmanned Dragon capsule (named "Red Dragon") to Mars and land it. It's a tight schedule, so I'm a bit sceptical. But still it shows that they have their aim set on Mars, and that they have come a surprisingly long way. And a suborbital trip with Virgin Galactic will just cost around $250 000. Now, that's not comparable to an orbital trip, but technology develops rapidly, and notice how much space technology have developed recently now that private companies are getting involved. SpaceX have already demonstrated ways to reduce launch costs, and I don't doubt that private companies will continue to make spaceflight cheaper and cheaper. Especially if they start to develop hybrid SSTO vehicles instead of just pure rockets. Funnily enough, I'm pessimistic where you are optimistic. Asteroid mining requires advanced and expensive infrastructure in space, either where the asteroids are (if we mine them there) or near Earth (if we bring them here before mining them). It will happen eventually, but not anytime soon.
  19. That's a possibility (one that didn't actually cross my mind), but it's fairly unlikely. While there is currently a lot that we don't know about the human brain, improvements are being made at a very rapid pace. We are already working on simulating whole brains on supercomputers, and the level of detail that we can see is constantly improving. My estimation is that we will understand practically everything about the brain before, say 2060, but we will probably before that be able to build a human level AI (albeit one that operate on somewhat different principles).
  20. Eventually AI will replace all jobs that a human can perform (and a lot that we can't), even the ones requiring intuition. Saying anything else is equivalent to saying there is something magical with the human brain that can't be replicated artificially. Or in other words: We already know that machines with full human capacity in everyway are possible, because they already exist: They are called humans. This will lead to job loss, but since it will be gradual and obvious, we will be able to intervene before it's to late. Exactly how I'm not certain, but I don't doubt that people that are smarter than me can figure it out. All things considered, I have a very positive view of the rise of AI.
  21. The Gear VR is a lot better. I would even say that it is better than the Oculus Rift DK1 (not the consumer version, however). It does however need a Samsung phone to work. I agree. The PC VR headsets are currently a bit expensive. I will personally wait a generation or two before I buy one. The Gear VR however is definitely worth the money. And despite being an entry level device it is very well polished. Definitely good enough for Minecraft. Although it did crash once for me while playing...
  22. I voted that the future will be very positive. That doesn't mean that I think that there aren't any problems, but I think that the progress we will make will far outweigh those problems. By 2035 self-driving electric cars will be mainstream. Virtual reality will be much more sophisticated, even if we will not be able to achieve it in comercial products by directly influencing the brain (Yet! That will come later). Artificial intelligence will have advanced to the point where it is almost on par with human intelligence thanks to neural networks and a deeper understanding of the human brain. Cancer will be a lot more treatable, and have a significantly higher survival rate. Robots will perform surgery, thus significantly increasing survival rate, since when these robots do make a mistake, all robots will just be patched to avoid to make the same mistake again (the same thing applies to self-driving cars). Drones will deliver packages, and be used by various industries, such as farming, mining, forestry and the police. A manned Mars mission will occur during this decade, likely by a private company (like SpaceX). We will have several space stations, most privately owned by companies, and inflatable (like those from Bigelow Aerospace). Space will still remain somewhat exclusive, but far more people will be able to go to space. The two most obvious problems for the future I see is that surveillance will increase significantly, and since AI will replace a lot of jobs (mostly white collar jobs), there will be a lot of unemployment. This will however be on a large scale, happen gradually and it will be very clear long beforehand that we will be heading in this direction. Therefore various interventions will be put in place in time to counter this.
  23. Just recently, Minecraft for the Gear VR was released. Have anyone here tired it yet? What did you think about it? I just spent about two hours playing it, and I think it's awesome! When I was caving, I really felt on edge all the time. It's the most intense experience in virtual reality I have ever had thus far. Although I do miss an option to sprint, and several times while caving I wanted to press F3 to see how far down I was. I guess we can't have everything. Still, it's an amazing experience and could definitely be one of those "killer apps" that will get VR truly off the ground. So I would like to hear your thoughts. Have you brought this app, and what did you think about it? Do you WANT to play it? Have you tried this in multiplayer?
  24. I don't think of Asperger's as something negative. I think of it more as a trade-of. A knack for logical thinking and other positive effects, but also some negative effects such as reduced social competence (essentially the "nerd syndrome" as it has been called, and it's nerds that rule the world). Nothing insurmountable, however. I will give the video a look.
×
×
  • Create New...